Exemple de utilizare a Official codification în Engleză și traducerile lor în Română
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The official codification of Federal statutes is called the United States Code.
However, the Commission rightly points out that the current version, that is to say, Directive 2006/115,is merely an official codification of Directive 92/100.
Adoption of codified acts by the legislature is subject to the rules set out in the Inter-institutional Agreement on an Accelerated Working Method for Official Codification of 20 December 1994.
Since an official codification does not substantively amend the legal act replaced see the interinstitutional agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for the official codification of legislative texts OJ 1996 C 102, p.
(PT) I am voting for the amended Commission proposal having regard to the interinstitutional agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for the official codification of legislative texts and, in particular, to point 4 thereof.
In writing.- Having sought legal advice, the services stated that, having regard to the interinstitutional agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts and, in particular, to point 4 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 21 September 2010 for the purpose of examining, among others, the proposal submitted by the Commission.
Since such a redrafting would imply a substantive change, and would therefore go beyond straightforward codification, it was considered necessary that point 84 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994- Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts- be applied, in the light of the Joint declaration on that point5.
In its opinion of 23 October 2014 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that at the date on which the proposal referred to in point 1 was submitted by the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council it confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Since the insertion of such a recital would imply a substantive change, and would therefore go beyond straightforward codification, it was considered necessary that point 85 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994- Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts- be applied, in the light of the Joint Declaration on that point6.
In its opinion of 16 October 2008 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal in question does confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Since the insertion of such a recital would have implied a substantive change, and would have therefore gone beyond straightforward codification, it was considered necessary that point 86 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994- Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts- be applied, in the light of the Joint Declaration on that point7.
In its opinion of 11 June 2003,the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the above proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Articles 294 and 50 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament; the interinstitutional agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts; Rules 86 and 55 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure; and lastly, the report by the Committee on Legal Affairs.
In its opinion of 7 November 2003, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council andthe Commission set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.