Exemple de utilizare a Simplified revision în Engleză și traducerile lor în Română
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The competences of the EU, however,may not be extended by means of a simplified revision procedure.
That would render the use of the simplified revision procedure of Article 48(6) TEU impossible.
The simplified revision procedure is going to be used for the first time: that anti-democratic method which makes no provision for parliamentary debate.
They may also be amended in accordance with simplified revision procedures.
The simplified revision proposal therefore sparked a lively debate in which arguments based on the solid principles of the process of European integration came up against pragmatism and realpolitik.
The Treaty of Lisbon allows for a simplified revision procedure and makes revision more democratic.
As this amendment will not increase thecompetences of the Union, all members of the European Council agreed that it was appropriate to use a simplified revision procedure.
Lastly, while it may have been necessary to use the simplified revision procedure in this case, I believe that it must remain an exception.
In writing.-(CS) The introduction of the stability mechanism for states paying in euro marks the first use of the simplified revision option in the Lisbon Treaty.
However, I cannot fail to stress that this simplified revision process must not set precedents for future constitutional revisions. .
Otherwise that provision would prevent any Treaty addition in accordance with the simplified revision procedure of Article 48(6) TEU.
If however the simplified revision procedure under Article 48(6) TEU is chosen- as it was without doubt in this case(4)- for an amendment, then the restrictions on that procedure must be respected.
What is worse,it supports an abuse of authority which consists in using the simplified revision procedure of the Treaty of Lisbon in order to try and avoid a possible referendum.
A formal amendment of Part Three of the TFEU must not have as a consequence a substantive amendment of primary law which may not be amended by means of the simplified revision procedure.
As far as the procedure is concerned,the Commission believes that the conditions have been met for undertaking a simplified revision of the Treaty such as that envisaged in Article 48(6) of the Treaty on European Union.
Having regard to the use of the simplified revision procedure pursuant to Article 48(6) TEU and, in particular, whether the proposed amendment to Article 136 TFEU involved an increase in the competences conferred on the Union in the Treaties?
Accordingly, having regard to Article 3(1)(c) TFEU,it must be held that Decision 2011/199 does not infringe the restrictions on the simplified revision procedure under Article 48(6) TEU.
For that reason it is imperative that a Treaty provision adopted in accordance with the simplified revision procedure of Article 48(6) TEU must be interpreted in a way that takes into account the restrictions on that procedure.
Mr Pringle, a member of the Irish Parliament,claims before the Irish courts that the amendment of the TFEU by a European Council decision- therefore using the simplified revision procedure- is unlawful.
Nevertheless, I cannot fail to stress that this simplified revision process must not set precedents for future constitutional revisions when there are no truly exceptional circumstances, such as these we are currently experiencing.
The European Council agreed on the text of the draft Decision amending the TFEU set out in Annex I. It decided to immediately launch the simplified revision procedure provided for in Article 48(6) TEU.
In that regard, it must be recalled that, under the first subparagraph of Article 48(6)TEU, the simplified revision procedure concerns‘revising all or part of the provisions of Part Three of the[FEU] Treaty, relating to the internal policies and actions of the Union'.
The applicant claims that the wording of Treaty provisions which are adopted using this procedure must expressly reflect the restrictions to be found in Article 48(6)TEU, because after such provisions enter into force the limits of the simplified revision procedure are no longer apparent.
His submission is rather that because the proposed insertion is made using the simplified revision procedure, the limits of that procedure must also be expressly reflected in the wording of the provision, because otherwise it could be interpreted as being unrestricted.
In the applicant's opinion,the specified provision is so vaguely worded that it could permit the Member States to undertake action which might exceed the bounds of what is permissible on the basis of a Treaty amendment in the simplified revision procedure of Article 48(6) TEU.
Under the ordinary and simplified revision procedures, amendments to the Treaties enter into force after being ratified(or approved, for simplified revision procedures) by all the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional provisions, which usually require parliamentary ratification.
It follows from all the foregoing that Decision 2011/199 satisfies the condition laid down in the first and second subparagraphs of Article 48(6)TEU that a revision of the FEU Treaty by means of the simplified revision procedure may concern only provisions of Part Three of the FEU Treaty.
On 16 December 2010, the European Council decided to consult the European Parliament under the simplified revision procedure laid down in Article 48(6) of the Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning a proposal to revise Article 136 of the Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union with regard to a stability mechanism for Member States whose currency is the euro.
By its first question, the referring court seeks to ascertain whether Decision 2011/199 is valid in so far as it amends Article 136 TFEU by providing for the insertion,on the basis of the simplified revision procedure under Article 48(6) TEU, of an Article 136(3) relating to the establishment of a stability mechanism.
Nonetheless, after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, which introduced,in addition to the ordinary procedure for the revision of the FEU Treaty, a simplified revision procedure under Article 48(6) TEU, the question arises whether the Court is required to ensure that the Member States, when they undertake a revision of the FEU Treaty using that simplified procedure, comply with the conditions laid down by that provision.