Exemple de utilizare a Straightforward codification în Engleză și traducerile lor în Română
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The Consultative Working Party concluded that the proposal is a straightforward codification of existing texts, without any change in their substance.
This proposal concerns the straightforward codification of the rules already in force on indications or marks identifying the lot to which a foodstuff belongs, without making changes to their substance on which Parliament might need to give an opinion.
The latter shall examine it in accordance with the arrangements agreed at interinstitutional level10in order to ascertain that it is a straightforward codification, with no changes of a substantive nature.
Since the insertion of such a recital would haveimplied a substantive change, and would have therefore gone beyond straightforward codification, it was considered necessary that point 86 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994- Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts- be applied, in the light of the Joint Declaration on that point7.
In its further opinion of 17 December 2015 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services has stated that that amended proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Since, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission,the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance, I am adopting its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
In its further opinion of 12 October 2010 the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services has stated that that amended proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
An examination of the proposal for a Council directive codifying Council Directive 92/79/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the approximation of taxes on cigarettes, Council Directive 92/80/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the approximation of taxes on manufactured tobacco other than cigarettes, and Council Directive 95/59/EC of 27 November 1995 on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco, resulted in the Consultative Working Party's concluding, without dissent,that the proposal is a straightforward codification of existing texts, without any change in their substance.
With due regard for the opinions of the legal services of Parliament, the Council and the Commission,which have concluded that the Commission proposal was confined to straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance, I welcome the adoption of this proposal at the first reading.
I agree with the position set out in this report, taking into account the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and because this is,therefore, a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
I voted in favour of this report because, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission,the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance and therefore, in the interests of clarity and rationality, the existing texts should be codified.
In its opinion of 23 October 2014 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that at the date on which the proposal referred to in point 1 wassubmitted by the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council it confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
With due regard for the opinions of the legal services of Parliament, the Council and the Commission,which have concluded that the Commission proposal was confined to a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance, I welcome the adoption of this proposal.
In its opinion of 27.9.2007 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts5 stated that the proposal referred to in point 2 confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments,that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing text, without any change in its substance.
In its opinion of 16 October 2008 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal in question does confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
In writing.- I voted for this report because, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission,the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
I totally agree that the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council andthe Commission should be taken into consideration as I think that the proposal in question is simply limited to a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
In its opinion of 11 June 2003, the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the above proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on braking devices of wheeled agricultural orforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
(PT) Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this report on the proposal for a Council regulation on denominations andtechnical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
(PT) Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the permissible sound level andthe exhaust system of motor vehicles concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament andof the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
(PT) Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on indications ormarks identifying the lot to which a foodstuff belongs concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on rear-mounted roll-over protection structures of narrow-track wheeled agricultural andforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
In its opinion of 17 September 2014 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that at the date on which the proposal referred to in point 1 wassubmitted by the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council it confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
In its opinion of 7 November 2003, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective Legal Servicesof the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.