Exemples d'utilisation de Objection formulated en Anglais et leurs traductions en Français
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Requirement of confirmation of an objection formulated prior to the expression of consent to be bound by a treaty.
An objection to a reservation formulated after the end of the time period specified in guideline 2.6.12 does not produce all the legal effects of an objection formulated within that time period.
This result cannot be called into question by an objection formulated several years after the cutoff date without seriously affecting legal security.
An objection formulated to the reservation continues to have effect as long as its author does not withdraw it, insofar as theobjection does not apply exclusively to that part of the reservation which has been withdrawn.
The fact that a late objection could be accepted butdid not produce all the legal effects of an objection formulated within the specified time period did not provide the necessary legal certainty in that area.
This result cannot be called into question by an objection formulated after the treaty has entered into force between the two States or international organizations without seriously affecting legal security.
This is clearly the case with respect to the time at which an objection may be formulated; the question of the confirmation of an objection formulated before the author is a party must obviously be posed in different terms.
Non-requirement of confirmation of an objection formulated prior to formal confirmation of a reservation An objection to a reservation formulated by a State or an international organization prior to confirmation of the reservation in accordance with guideline 2.2.1 does not itself require confirmation.
In that regard, some concerns were raised over theambiguity of guideline 2.6.13, on objections formulated late, according to which an objection formulated late does not produce"all" the legal effects of an objection formulated within the 12-month time period.
An objection formulated prior to the expression of consent to be bound by the treaty does not need to be formally confirmed by the objecting State or international organization at the time it expresses its consent to be bound if that State or that organization had signed the treaty when it had formulated the objection; it must be confirmed if the State or the international organization had not signed the treaty.
In conclusion, one may reasonably consider that the formal confirmation of an objection formulated by a State or an international organization that has not yet expressed its consent to be bound by the treaty is by no means essential.
The Commission considered the report and adopted the following draft guidelines: 2.6.5(Author), 2.6.11(Non-requirement of confirmation of an objection made prior to formal confirmation of a reservation),2.6.12(Requirement of confirmation of an objection formulated prior to the expression of consent to be bound by a treaty) and 2.8 Forms of acceptance of reservations.
Subject to the provisions of guideline 5.2.2,a successor State shall be considered as maintaining any objection formulated by the predecessor State to a reservation formulated by a contracting State or contracting organization, unless it expresses a contrary intention at the time of the succession.
In guideline 2.6.13(Objections formulated late)it was unclear what was meant by the statement that a late objection did not produce all the legal effects of an objection formulated on time, as there was no indication which legal effects were or were not produced.
Subject to the provisions of guideline 5.11,a successor State shall be considered as maintaining any objection formulated by the predecessor State to a reservation formulated by a contracting State or contracting international organization or by a State party or international organization party to a treaty unless it expresses a contrary intention at the time of the succession.
It was also noted that at the time that the effects of objections were considered, it should be made clear that an objection formulated by a State or international organization entitled to become a party to the treaty would not produce legal effects until such time as the State or international organization in question had actually become party to the treaty.
Objections formulated jointly.
Objections formulated late.
The objections formulated during the expert testimony of R. Engle are reiterated.