Exemples d'utilisation de Working group had discussed en Anglais et leurs traductions en Français
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He asked whether the working group had discussed that point.
The Working Group had discussed that problem at length, and the solution proposed appeared in paragraphs(2) and(3) of article 19.
The Chair of the Working Group on Implementation informed the Bureau that the Working Group had discussed such a way forward.
At its twentieth session, the Working Group had discussed the form that the instrument being prepared should take.
Mr. Kasanda, Chairperson-Rapporteur, introduced the topic by saying that, during its fourth session, the Working Group had discussed the theme of racism and housing.
The Working Group had discussed other aspects of the work at UNECE, and reiterated its support of the activities of UNECE WP.6 and the"MARS" Group. .
During the review of the proposed draft text, the delegation of Germany pointed to the fact that all cranberries on themarket were sugared and that a discussion of the proposed standard should be postponed until the working group had discussed the issue.
The Subcommittee noted that the Working Group had discussed potential options for establishing possible cooperation between the Committee and IAEA see A/AC.105/C.1/L.271/Rev.1.
Noting from paragraph 7 of the report that the Committee on the Rights of the Child had encouraged States parties, inter alia, to redraft their reservations,he asked whether the working group had discussed that point, since the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties made it clear that reservations must be entered at the time of ratification.
The Commission noted that the Working Group had discussed at its fifty-third session the matter of submissions by third parties(amicus curiae) in arbitral proceedings.
The Working Group had discussed the matter extensively, however, and had concluded that those who had reservations about preliminary orders required such a stringent provision.
Dr Wilkins recalled that,at its 2004 meeting, the Working Group had discussed whether an OIE Resolution on the issue could be drafted, but this had not been possible.
When the Working Group had discussed the way forward, several delegations had once again mentioned the possibility of requesting the International Law Commission to study certain aspects of the question.
Ms. Motoc, referring to the aforementioned judgement,asked whether the working group had discussed the joint separate opinion of Judge Higgins, Judge Kooijmans, Judge Elaraby, Judge Owada and Judge Simma, which referred to the Committee's general comment No. 24.
The working group had discussed several tax calculation and aggregation procedures and had suggested changes in the weighting used in aggregating the tax data, in the determination of the tax deductions and in the regression techniques.
Leo Netten, rapporteur of the workshop,said that the working group had discussed the"Aiakos" program, which involves exchanges between young professionals(judges, lawyers and other legal professionals) and has attracted considerable interest.
The working group had discussed the practice of each treaty body in relation to reservations by States parties to the international human rights treaties, as well as relevant developments in the work of the International Law Commission.
It was recalled that, at its previous session, the Working Group had discussed variations in the interpretation by domestic courts of the writing requirement of article II(2) of the New York Convention.
The working group had discussed, inter alia, the responsibility of States for guaranteeing the rights of individuals within their jurisdiction and protecting them from the impact of the activities of transnational corporations, especially in developing countries.
Ms. Leblanc(Canada), referring to paragraph 18, said that although the Working Group had discussed the definitions of the terms"unfair competitive advantage" and"conflict of interest", the text did not seem to offer additional clarity.
It was recalled that the Working Group had discussed the same issue at its sixteenth session and that it had agreed that imposing the same form requirement for an amendment and for the establishment of the undertaking would be too restrictive in practice A/CN.9/358, para. 89.
The Subcommittee noted that,at its current session, the Working Group had discussed the results of the workshop and developed a preliminary draft report of the workshop see the appendix of annex III to the present report.
The Working Group had discussed a proposal to expand the role of the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague under the Arbitration Rules; however, the Commission had agreed that the mechanism established in the 1976 Rules should not be changed.
Leo Netten, rapporteur of the workshop,said that the working group had discussed the"Aiakos" program, which involves exchanges between young professionals(judges, lawyers and other legal professionals) and has attracted considerable interest.
The Commission noted that the Working Group had discussed at its forty-ninth session a proposal aimed at expanding the role of the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules A/CN.9/665, paras. 47-50.
At its forty-second session,the Commission noted that the Working Group had discussed a proposal aimed at expanding the role of the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules A/CN.9/665, paras. 47-50.
The Commission noted that the Working Group had discussed at its forty-eighth session the extent to which the revised UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules should include more detailed provisions concerning investor-State dispute settlement or administered arbitration.
At its forty-second session(Vienna, 29 June-17 July 2009),the Commission noted that the Working Group had discussed at its forty-ninth session a proposal aimed at expanding the role of the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague("the PCA") under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules A/CN.9/665, paras. 47-50.
It was recalled that the Working Group had discussed that matter at its previous session(A/CN.9/618, paragraph 33), and the concerns expressed at that time were reiterated.
At its previous session the Working Group had discussed all the articles prepared by the International Law Commission and had referred them to the Drafting Committee.