Examples of using An explanation for its deviation in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Secretariat had requested the Party to submit an explanation for its deviation.
(c) To note with appreciation that Chile has submitted an explanation for its deviation and has fulfilled its commitment contained in decision XVII/29 to introduce an enhanced ozone-depleting substances licensing and quota system;
In a letter dated 7 June 2006,the Party has been requested to submit an explanation for its deviation.
Standardized recommendation textc2 addresses the matter of a Party that submitted an explanation for its deviation to a previous meeting of the Committee that confirms its non-compliance but has not yet submitted a plan of action.
Standardized recommendation a1 addresses thesituation where a Party has reported a deviation from the Protocol ' s control measures that is being considered by the Committee for the first time, and has not submitted an explanation for its deviation or a plan of action to address the deviation. .
Standardized recommendation type 4addresses the matter of a Party that has submitted an explanation for its deviation that confirms that the deviation did not constitute non-compliance with the Protocol.
Standardized recommendation b3 addresses the situationwhere a Party has not submitted an explanation for its deviation or a plan of action.
Standardized recommendation c1addresses the situation where a Party which submitted an explanation for its deviation at a previous meeting of the Committee that confirms its non-compliance has now submitted a plan of action in accordance with a recommendation of the Committee.
Standardized recommendation type 5 addresses the situationwhere a Party has not submitted an explanation for its deviation or a plan of action.
Standardized recommendation b4 addresses thesituation where a Party has submitted an explanation for its deviation and a plan of action to return it to compliance that contains time-specific benchmarks and supporting regulatory and policy measures.
In the same recommendation the Committee requested Bosnia and Herzegovina to submit to the Secretariat as a matter of urgency,and no later than 31 March 2009, an explanation for its deviation from its commitment for 2007 contained in decision XV/30.
Standardized recommendation c2addresses the situation where a Party submitted an explanation for its deviation at a previous meeting of the Committee that confirms its non-compliance, but has not yet submitted a plan of action in accordance with a recommendation of the Committee.
Following an explanation of the options by the Secretariat the Committee agreed that theParty should be asked to provide an explanation for its deviation from its obligations under the Protocol.
Standardized recommendation type 3addresses the matter of a Party that has submitted an explanation for its deviation from the Protocol ' s consumption or production control measures that confirms its noncompliance with those measures, but has not submitted a plan of action.
Standardized recommendation b1 addresses the situation where a Party has submitted an explanation for its deviation from the Protocol ' s consumption or production control measures that confirms its non-compliance with those measures, but has not submitted a plan of action.
(b) To request Bosnia and Herzegovina to submit to the Secretariat as a matter of urgency,and no later than 31 March 2009, an explanation for its deviation from its commitment contained in decision XV/30;
The party was requested, as stated in recommendation 44/7, to submit to the Secretariat as a matter of urgency,and preferably no later than 1 September 2010, an explanation for its deviation and, if relevant, a plan of action with time-specific benchmarksfor ensuring its prompt return to compliance.
Standardized recommendation type7 addresses the matter of a Party that submitted an explanation for its deviation to a previous meeting of the Committee that confirms its non-compliance and has at the current meeting of the Committee submitted a plan of action to return it to compliance that contains timespecific benchmarks and supporting regulatory and policy measures.
Standardized recommendation text b2addresses the matter of a Party that has submitted an explanation for its deviation that confirms that the deviation did not constitute non-compliance with the Protocol.
Standardized recommendation type 3addresses the situation where a Party has submitted an explanation for its deviation from the Protocol ' s consumption or production control measures that confirms its non-compliance with those measures but has not submitted a plan of action.
Standardized recommendation b2 addresses thesituation where a Party has submitted an explanation for its deviation that confirms that the deviation did not constitute non-compliance with the Protocol.
Standardized recommendation text b1addresses the matter of a Party that has submitted an explanation for its deviation from the Protocol ' s consumption or production control measures that confirms its noncompliance with those measures, but has not submitted a plan of action.
Standardized recommendation type 6 addresses thesituation where a Party has submitted an explanation for its deviation and a plan of action to return it to compliance that contains time-specific benchmarks and supporting regulatory and policy measures.
Standardized recommendation type 6addresses the matter of a Party that has submitted an explanation for its deviation and a plan of action to return it to compliance that contains time-specific benchmarks and supporting regulatory and policy measures.
To request Dominica to submit to the Secretariat as soon as possible,and no later than 16 August 2006, an explanation for its deviation and, if relevant, a plan of action with time-specific benchmarksfor ensuring the Party ' s prompt return to compliance;
Standardized recommendation type 3 addressesthe situation where a Party has submitted an explanation for its deviation from the Protocol ' s consumption or production control measures that confirms its non-compliance with those measures, but has not submitted a plan of action.
In response to recommendation 42/21, Mexico submitted,in correspondence dated 3 August and 12 September 2009, an explanation for its deviation from its commitment contained in decision XVIII/30 and a plan of action with time-specific benchmarks for ensuring its prompt return to compliance.
Noting also that Libya has not responded to the requestrecorded in recommendation 46/8 to submit to the Secretariat an explanation for its deviation and, if relevant, a plan of action with timespecific benchmarksfor ensuring its prompt return to compliance with its commitment contained in decision XVII/37.