Examples of using Another representative expressed in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Another representative expressed support for allowing withdrawal after one year.
One representative urged the international communitynot to allow such living conditions to continue, whereas another representative expressed concern about the difficult new phase that Palestinian women and children might enter if the issue of continuous occupation was not properly addressed.
Another representative expressed gratitude for the secretariat ' s detailed report on the strategy.
Along the same lines, another representative expressed disagreement with the Special Rapporteur ' s view on the merits of compulsory third-party settlement of disputes.
Another representative expressed her concern regarding the procedure followed for the submission of the draft resolution on cities and climate change.
Agreeing with that observation, another representative expressed the view that the value of such a group would be to build consensus and provide negotiation, but stated that the proposed group should be openended.
Another representative expressed support for the Committee ' s request that the report prepared in accordance with decision XVIII/17 should identify the Parties concerned.
In response, another representative expressed his confidence that New Zealand would use virtually impermeable films in order to limit methyl bromide emissions.
Another representative expressed concern regarding the proposed cost of the preparatory process and what was described as a cumbersome, bottom-up approach to information gathering.
Another representative expressed concern about objective 4, activity(c)(iii), strengthening the legal basis of the precautionary approach as contained in the Rio principles.
Another representative expressed her concern over agricultural subsidies and distorted market conditions that stood in the way of sustainable development and fair trade.
Another representative expressed concern that a few issues raised at recent meetings, such as those with regard to economic feasibility, had not been considered in the most recent draft.
Another representative expressed the concern of her Government that the increase in the projected programme for the region of Asia and the Pacific was much lower than the increases projected for the other regions.
Another representative expressed reservations regarding the recommendation that synergies between multilateral environmental agreements on ozone, climate and persistent organic pollutants should be pursued.
Another representative expressed concern that the proposed provision might induce States to modify pre-existing legal relationships or even, in some circumstances, to enact legislation that disregarded the principle of non-retroactivity.
Another representative expressed concern that issues of illegal trade in ozone-depleting substances and equipment containing them were being considered in isolation when they ought to be dealt with as part of the topic of trade as a whole.
Another representative expressed his concern that the issue of support to countries not yet Parties but in the process of ratifying the Montreal Protocol had not been considered by the Panel in the report or elsewhere.
Another representative expressed the belief that the improvement of universal access to basic services was a fundamental component in the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals but an ambitious objective that could be achieved only through sustained and lasting efforts.
Another representative expressed agreement that there were problems with the existing procedures, saying that his Government regularly observed significant differences between the information reported by the Customs authorities and that reported by the environment management authority.
Another representative expressed concern that the paragraph might lend itself to different interpretations since the category of" crimes under international law" was not sufficiently well defined or widely accepted to form the basis for the jurisdiction of an international criminal court.
Another representative expressed disagreement with the idea that parties operating under paragraph 1 of article 5 would be unable to meet their obligations under the Protocol, saying that the view articulated by the representative of India was an expression of opinion rather than a statement of fact.
Another representative expressed concern at the number of nominations for critical-use exemptions being submitted, especially by parties that had considerable stockpiles of methyl bromide, and he requested clarification on how the level of stockpiles was taken into account in assessing exemptions.
Another representative expressed concern that a request for action by the Executive Committee, as proposed in the draft decision, might create obstacles to the approval of projects within stage II of countries ' HCFC phase-out management plans, to the detriment of the parties concerned.
Another representative expressed support for phasing down the use of dental amalgam but said that such action posed significant challenges and should take account of national circumstances; in the meantime, all current existing methods of dental restoration would need to remain available to the dental profession in the short and medium term.
Another representative expressed the desire to see UNEP, as part of its work under this subprogramme, give full technical and financial support to all regions to allow countries to attend the seventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the second Earth Summit.
Another representative expressed support for a life-cycle approach to the management of ozonedepleting substances, while acknowledging the financial challenges of collecting and destroying them, and said that pilot projects under the Multilateral Fund would be useful in generating information and identifying financing opportunities.
Another representative expressed concern that the provision of paragraph 5 did not indicate what would happen if the Prosecutor stood by his decision: in his opinion it seemed preferable to leave the decision entirely to the discretion of the Prosecutor or to allow the parties concerned to appeal against it before a body fulfilling the function of an appeals chamber.
Another representative expressed disagreement, arguing that the ultimate objective of the Montreal Protocol, as expressed in its preamble, was to control emissions of chemicals that depleted the ozone layer and that if emissions were still occurring despite the phase-out of production and consumption it was clearly a matter for discussion by the parties.
Another representative expressed appreciation for the work done to prepare the programme of work for 2014- 2015 in accordance with the medium-term strategy for 2014- 2017, and stressed that the strengthening of UNEP should be carried out in a manner that made efficient use of available resources, focusing on the core mandate and avoiding any unnecessary burden on Member States and the secretariat.
Another representative expressed frustration that, while many developing countries had made strenuous efforts to eliminate the use of methyl bromide in soil treatments by the phase-out date, some parties not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol, with considerable financial and technical means, had indicated that they would continue to submit requests for critical-use nominations up to 2016.