Examples of using Apparent deviation in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Secretariat also sought the Party 's advice on this apparent deviation.
(b) Apparent deviation from Annex B, group I,(other CFCs) consumption control measures.
The Secretariat has requested the Party to submit an explanation for the apparent deviation.
(a) Compliance issue subject to review: apparent deviation from Annex B, group I(other CFCs) consumption control measures.
(b) Any response from the Party to the Secretariat 's invitation to explain the apparent deviation; and.
The Secretariat had requested China to submit an explanation for the apparent deviation from its Protocol obligations, but no response had yet been received.
In correspondence dated 16 June 2006,the Secretariat had invited Niger to submit an explanation for that apparent deviation.
Submission of explanation for and, if relevant,a plan of action to return to compliance from, an apparent deviation in 2005 from the Protocol ' s carbon tetrachloride consumption control measures.
In correspondence dated 16 June 2006,the Secretariat invited Niger to submit an explanation for this apparent deviation.
The Party had reported consumption for that year of 5.1 ODP-tonnes,representing an apparent deviation from the Protocol ' s carbon tetrachloride consumption control measures in 2006.
In correspondence dated 9 June 2006,the Secretariat invited Mexico to submit an explanation for this apparent deviation.
In reporting its data theParty had indicated that it was aware of the apparent deviation and had said that it was investigating the possibility that the deviation had been caused by laboratory and analytical uses.
In correspondence dated 18 May 2006,the Secretariat invited Mauritius to submit an explanation for this apparent deviation.
The aforementioned paper wasoriginally prepared to address a case involving an apparent deviation from one of the Protocol ' s control measures by a very small quantity of ODS( .0054 ODP tonnes).
In correspondence dated 22 May 2006,the Secretariat invited Dominica to submit an explanation for this apparent deviation.
In its report,the Party had indicated that it was aware of the apparent deviation, and was investigating the matter further; it was possible that it could be accounted for by laboratory and analytical uses, but that had not yet been confirmed.
In correspondence dated 9 June 2006,the Secretariat had invited Mexico to submit an explanation for that apparent deviation.
Submission of explanation for and, if relevant,a plan of action to return to compliance from, an apparent deviation in 2006 from the Protocol ' s Annex B, group II, substance(carbon tetrachloride) consumption control measures.
In correspondence dated 11 September 2006,the Secretariat invited the Russian Federation to submit an explanation for this apparent deviation.
Submission of an explanation for and, if relevant,a plan of action to return to compliance from, an apparent deviation in 2005 from the Protocol ' s consumption control measures for Annex A, group I, substances(CFCs).
In correspondence dated 6 September 2006,the Secretariat invited the Democratic Republic of Congo to submit an explanation for this apparent deviation.
Submission of documentation to support alternate Annex A, group I,(CFCs)production baseline calculation and explain apparent deviation from the Protocol ' s CFC production control measures in 2005.
The correspondence had not included anexplanation for the United Arab Emirates ' apparent deviation from the Protocol ' s carbon tetrachloride consumption control measures in 2005, but rather had expanded on the basis for the Party ' s view that the baseline data held by the Ozone Secretariat should be replaced.
In addition, subsequent to that meeting,Turkmenistan reported data that showed an apparent deviation from its Protocol obligations for 2008.
In correspondence dated 27 June 2006,the Secretariat invited Kenya to submit an explanation for this apparent deviation. During the last meeting of the Committee, a response was received from the Government of Kenya. A copy of the correspondence was provided to Committee members so that they could give it appropriate consideration prior to the current meeting.
In correspondence dated 27 October 2005,the Secretariat requested China to submit an explanation for this apparent deviation from its Protocol obligations.
Singapore reported methyl bromide consumption of 42.620 metric tonnes(25.572 ODP tonnes),representing an apparent deviation from the Protocol ' s requirement that the Party freeze consumption of methyl bromide at its baseline level of 4.965 ODP tonnes.
During the meeting, a response was received from the Government of Kenya to the Secretariat ' s invitation to explain the Party ' s apparent deviation from its CFC phase-out measures.
Noting with concern that Serbia had reported carbon tetrachloride consumption for 2006 of 5.1 ODPtonnes,representing an apparent deviation from its obligation to reduce its consumption of that controlled substance to no greater than 2.8 ODP-tonnes in that year.
In correspondence dated 3 August 2006,the Secretariat invited the Islamic Republic of Iran to submit an explanation for this apparent deviation. The Party has not responded to date.