Examples of using Charter amendment in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Proposals requiring Charter amendment.
Charter amendment was a complex process requiring ratification by over 120 Governments.
(b) Proposals requiring Charter amendment.
The meeting was held in Rabat, Kingdom of Morocco, from 27 to 29 October 1986.This session was dedicated to the Charter amendment.
Member of the Arab League ' s Charter Amendment Committee.
People also translate
It is not likely that a bargain could now be struck that wouldallow eliminating the veto privilege by simple Charter amendment.
Neither mechanism requires Charter amendment or reform.
The abolition ormodification of the veto would not be ratifiable through a Charter amendment.
The reform of the Security Council, which would require Charter amendment, obviously falls under the last category.
It does notapply to resolutions which only have implications for Charter amendment.
It proposes direct approval of a Charter amendment rather than a complex and uncertain three-stage process.
Proposals not necessarily requiring Charter amendment.
Enlargement will always lead to a Charter amendment and thus will be completed once the necessary ratifications are in place.
Proposals not necessarily requiring Charter amendment.
New Zealand will vote against any proposed Charter amendment on additional permanent membership of the Council that includes such a provision.
None of the current ideas have comeclose to generating the support required to pass a Charter amendment.
(a) Any resolution with Charter amendment implications must be adopted by the two-thirds majority referred to in Article 108 of the Charter; .
They argued that reform of the working methods,which would not require a Charter amendment, should be seen as a continuous process.
We are no closer today than we were a year ago to achieving thebroad consensus necessary to adopt and ratify a Charter amendment.
My delegation is fully aware that nopermanent member will at present accept a Charter amendment that results in the abolition of the veto power.
On the other hand, adapting the working methods is an ongoing process-- based on a dialogue among Member States--that does not lead to a Charter amendment.
The different nature of the two aspects of reform,with only enlargement requiring a Charter amendment, has to be taken into account in this regard.
Indeed, the Charter amendment needed for enlargement of the Council requires support that goes far beyond the numerically necessary two thirds of the membership.
A large majority of member States would seem to consider the vetoshould not be exercised with respect to Charter amendment(Article 108).
Introducing a term like“Charter amendment implications” is not helpful, and even risks disrespect for the Charter and its well-defined voting system.
(b) It is necessary to comply faithfully with the provisions ofArticle 108 of the Charter with respect to any resolution with Charter amendment implications;
Any resolution with Charter amendment implications must be adopted by the two-thirds majority of the United Nations membership referred to in Article 108 of the Charter. .
Moreover, one of the permanent members has alreadymade it abundantly clear that it would block any Charter amendment granting the veto to developing countries.
Need to comply faithfully with the provisions of Article 108 of theCharter of the United Nations with respect to any resolution with Charter amendment implications”.
Others deemed the two issues separable and of a different nature:enlargement was an event requiring Charter amendment, whereas the reform of working methods was a continuous process.
