Examples of using Claimants assert in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Some claimants assert that their premises were occupied by Iraq.
The Panel notes, as in the First“F3” Report and the Second“F3” Report, that some claimants assert that their premises were occupied by Iraq.
However, two claimants assert the loss of equipment leased to Kuwaiti and Iraqi entities.
With reference to paragraph 5 above,USD 2,798,855.28 is claimed by four claimants in respect of business losses that the claimants assert were suffered by Kuwaiti companies.
The claimants assert that the interruption of contracts was caused by Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
With reference to paragraph 5 above, USD 20,856,891.28 is claimed by11 claimants in respect of business losses that the claimants assert were suffered by Kuwaiti companies.
The claimants assert that the interruption of these contracts was caused by Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
With reference to paragraph 4 above, USD 42,318,440.38 is claimed by32 claimants in respect of business losses that the claimants assert were suffered by Kuwaiti companies.
The claimants assert that, as a result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait, they did not receive payments due under the loans.
The Panel considered the issue of delay penaltiesincurred on projects performed in Saudi Arabia that claimants assert were due to delays occasioned by Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The claimants assert that some sectors of the Tunisian population overtly supported Iraq and its president, as manifested in civil demonstrations.
With reference to paragraphs 4 and 5 above, USD 17,725,866.32 is claimed by18 claimants in respect of business losses that the claimants assert were suffered by Kuwaiti companies.
These claimants assert that their European clients cancelled proposed and confirmed tours to those two destinations, which resulted in a decline in the claimants' businesses.
There are three claims in part two of the twelfth instalment where,in addition to individual losses, the claimants assert losses for which claims were also filed by Kuwaiti companies in category" E".
On the basis of these allegations, the claimants assert that the number of incoming tourists to Cyprus during the period 2 August 1990 to 2 March 1991 declined substantially.
The Claimants assert that international law has consistently taken the view that injury to a national of one State by another State gives rise to a claim that belongs to the State of the national and not to the injured person.
The claimants assert that they had fully or partially performed their obligations under such contracts prior to Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait but did not receive payments due.
These claimants assert that the Kuwaiti partner was a shareholder only for the purpose of compliance with Kuwaiti law, and that they are accordingly justified in advancing the only claim with respect to the underlying loss.
Other claimants assert that the threat generated by scud missiles after mid-January 1991 prevented their employees from attending work, making it impossible to maintain the regular level of services offered.
The Claimants assert that approximately 865,000 non-Jordanian individuals who fled from Kuwait or Iraq during the period of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait(" evacuees") transited the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to return to their home countries./.
The Claimants assert that as a result, some of their employees incurred incidental transit costs for meals and accommodation which they would not have incurred under normal circumstances, and which costs were passed on to the Claimants. .
The Claimants assert that in the case of frustration of contract, these clauses accelerate the payments due under the contract, in effect giving rise to a new obligation on the part of Iraq to pay all the amounts due and owing under the contract regardless of when the underlying work was performed.
The Claimants assert that in the case of frustration of contract, these clauses accelerate the payments due under the contract, in effect giving rise to a new obligation on the part of Iraq to pay all the amounts due and owing under the contract regardless of when the underlying work was performed.
The Claimants assert that as a result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait, approximately 350,000 to 360,000 refugees entered Saudi Arabia from Kuwait during the period of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait./ The majority of the refugees, comprising Kuwaiti and non-Kuwaiti nationals, entered the country through Saudi Arabia ' s Eastern Province bordering Kuwait.
These claimants assert that, as a result of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, these contracts were cancelled by the tour operators due to security concerns for their clients, which resulted in lost revenues to the claimants. Some of the Cypriot claimants also claim compensation for the decline in revenues derived from tourism-associated businesses such as restaurants, discotheques and car-hires. One Cypriot claimant is the licensee of two airport duty-free shops.
Each claimant asserted sole ownership of the business.
The claimant asserted that his business associates confiscated the businesses after the liberation of Kuwait.
The Claimant asserted that fighting took place within the compound.
The Claimant asserted that the two centres required refurbishment following the loss and damage.
The Claimant asserted that approximately 200 employees performed overtime during this period.