Examples of using Claimants assert in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some claimants assert that their premises were occupied by Iraq.
With reference to paragraph 4 above,USD 32,897,110.87 is claimed by 10 claimants in respect of business losses that the claimants assert were suffered by Kuwaiti companies.
The claimants assert that the interruption of these contracts was caused by Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
With reference to paragraphs 4 and 5 above,USD 17,725,866.32 is claimed by 18 claimants in respect of business losses that the claimants assert were suffered by Kuwaiti companies.
The claimants assert that, as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, they did not receive payments due under the loans.
The Panel considered the issue of delay penalties incurred on projects performed in Saudi Arabia that claimants assert were due to delays occasioned by Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Some claimants assert that they were unable to file claims during the regular filing period, although their spouses were able to do so.
The Panel considered claims for increased costs of completing contracts due to a rise in the cost of labour and/or materials that claimants assert were caused by Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The claimants assert that some sectors of the Tunisian population overtly supported Iraq and its president, as manifested in civil demonstrations.
Theft from property in the Occupied Palestinian Territory on the other side of the Wall: Some claimants assert that because they cannot get to their property behind the Wall it is plundered, e.g., with saplings stolen, houses looted, etc.
Many claimants assert that the inability to undertake or complete voyages destined for ports in the Middle East resulted in a loss of profits.
On the basis of these allegations, the claimants assert that the number of incoming tourists to Cyprus during the period 2 August 1990 to 2 March 1991 declined substantially.
The claimants assert that they sustained a loss of profits resulting from a decline in business because they had to temporarily cease or reduce their business operations in Kuwait, Iraq or Saudi Arabia.
Many of these claimants assert that they were not permitted to file claims during the regular filing period or were prevented from claiming for certain types of losses.
Some claimants assert that they did not have a full and effective opportunity to file claims at that time because they were imprisoned in Kuwait for the entire period.
These claimants assert that their European clients cancelled proposed and confirmed tours to those two destinations, which resulted in a decline in the claimants' businesses.
The claimants assert that they had fully or partially performed their obligations under such contracts prior to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait but did not receive payments due.
A few of these claimants assert that such claims were filed without their knowledge and did not encompass all of the losses that they suffered as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Other claimants assert that the threat generated by scud missiles after mid-January 1991 prevented their employees from attending work, making it impossible to maintain the regular level of services offered.
These claimants assert that the Kuwaiti partner was a shareholder only for the purpose of compliance with Kuwaiti law, and that they are accordingly justified in advancing the only claim with respect to the underlying loss.
The Claimants assert that as a result, some of their employees incurred incidental transit costs for meals and accommodation which they would not have incurred under normal circumstances, and which costs were passed on to the Claimants. .
The Claimants assert that international law has consistently taken the view that injury to a national of one State by another State gives rise to a claim that belongs to the State of the national and not to the injured person.
The Claimants assert that approximately 865,000 non-Jordanian individuals who fled from Kuwait or Iraq during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait("evacuees") transited the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to return to their home countries./.
Some claimants assert that they had to stay in third countries for extended periods of time while awaiting the requisite papers to travel to Gaza, the West Bank or elsewhere, and were unable to file claims while in those third countries.
These claimants assert that during the period 2 August 1990 to 2 March 1991, people were generally reluctant to travel within Europe and elsewhere due to a fear that terrorist attacks against tourists would occur as a result of the situation in the Persian Gulf region.
The claimants assert, however, that the stables' horses, including the Valuation Items, were individually, not jointly, owned by the various members of the stables. The claimants allege that the family stables had a total of 230 horses prior to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Claimants assert that in the case of frustration of contract, these clauses accelerate the payments due under the contract, in effect giving rise to a new obligation on the part of Iraq to pay all the amounts due and owing under the contract regardless of when the underlying work was performed.
The Claimants assert that during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, Saudi Arabia provided"host nation support" in the form of transport, accommodation, food and water to approximately 560,000 troops from those nations participating in the Coalition against Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait(referred to in this report as the"Allied Coalition Forces")./ Saudi Arabian infrastructure and facilities were used by Allied Coalition Forces and Saudi Arabian troops during this period.
The Claimant asserts that these banknotes were submitted by 14 Tunisian nationals returning from Kuwait.
The Claimant asserts that work was delayed for nine months from August 1990.