Examples of using Denationalization in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Denationalization Bond(1st to 10th issuance).
If, furthermore,M & As take place in key industries," denationalization" can become a political issue.
Denationalization may take any of the following forms.
In his fourth report, the Special Rapporteur considered the issue of expulsion in cases of dual or multiple nationality andthat of loss of nationality or denationalization.
The denationalization of pharmacies has made it possible to improve the supply of medicines to medical establishments and the public and to reduce their price.
Similarly, her delegation fully supported the Special Rapporteur ' s decision not to study the conditions for acquisition of nationality orto draw up a draft article on denationalization.
However, she fully agreed that denationalization could be allowed only in exceptional circumstances and must not lead to statelessness.
It was also stated that a reference in the commentary to the rules on nationality would suffice,considering that questions of loss of nationality or denationalization may arise independently of any subsequent expulsion.
The permissibility of denationalization as a matter of international law was raised primarily in relation to these incidents of mass denationalization.
The fact that expulsions of persons having dual ormultiple nationality without prior denationalization were not unusual in practice did not suffice to make such expulsions legitimate.
Other members considered that the Commission should proceed to the preparation of draft articles on the expulsion of persons with dual ormultiple nationality and on denationalization as a preliminary to expulsion.
While the view was expressed that denationalization was prohibited by international law, some delegations were of the opinion that denationalization could be allowed in exceptional circumstances.
It seems quite unlikely that states will surrender their right todenationalize an individual in those cases where they consider such denationalization necessary for the protection of the internal value system of the state.
Other members were of the view that denationalization could never be used for the purposes of expulsion, while some others were of the view that denationalization was absolutely prohibited under international law.
Everybody has the right to decide about his/her nationality and all methods of compulsion,including indirect methods aiming at denationalization, are prohibited pursuant to the constitutional Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms.
As for denationalization in relation to expulsion, article 91 of the Constitution stated that a Salvadoran by birth could only lose that status by expressly renouncing it before a competent authority.
He shared those conclusions,and especially the conclusion that States should not use denationalization as a means of circumventing their obligations under the principle of the non-expulsion of nationals.
Mr. KAMTO(Special Rapporteur), introducing his fifth report on expulsion of aliens(A/CN.4/611), recalled that in his fourth report(A/CN.4/594) he had considered the issue of expulsion in cases of dual or multiple nationality andthat of loss of nationality or denationalization.
Moreover, his delegation did not agree with the view that denationalization was permissible provided that it did not lead to statelessness, that it was neither discriminatory nor arbitrary and that certain procedural guarantees were respected.
It was clear from the discussion in the Sixth Committee in 2008 that most of the delegations that had spoken on the topic shared the Special Rapporteur ' s view regarding the treatment of the issues of expulsion in cases of dual or multiple nationality,loss of nationality and denationalization.
It was stressed by some delegations that denationalization must not lead to statelessness; that it must take place in conformity with national legislation; that it must be non-discriminatory; and that it must not be resorted to in an arbitrary or abusive manner.
For the purposes of the draft articles, the principle of the non-expulsion of nationals also applied to persons who had legally acquired one or several other nationalities, and the commentary should make itclear that States should not use denationalization as a means of circumventing their obligations under the principle of non-expulsion of nationals.
Some members were of the view that denationalization was only allowed in exceptional circumstances; that it must not lead to statelessness; that it must be neither discriminatory nor arbitrary; and that it must respect certain procedural guarantees.
In connection with the topic" Expulsion of aliens", the Commission considered the fourth report of the Special Rapporteur(A/CN.4/594), dealing with questions relating to the expulsion of dual or multiple nationals,as well as loss of nationality or denationalization in relation to expulsion, prepared in the light of the debate in 2007.
At the two extremes of opinion one finds the view that denationalization is illegal tout court and the view that denationalization is within the discretion which States have in the matter of nationality and is therefore lawful.
(a) As the power to confer nationality is within the sovereign jurisdiction of each State, the State may establish in its domestic legislation conditions for the loss of its nationality and for the denationalization of its nationals provided that this does not result in statelessness and the denationalization is not arbitrary or discriminatory.
One State considered that denationalization was prohibited by international law, while others felt that denationalization was permissible under certain circumstances-- on condition, said some, that it did not lead to statelessness, that it was done in accordance with domestic law and that it was non-discriminatory, and on the understanding that it must not be done arbitrarily or unlawfully.
Some members had been of the opinion that the Commission should elaborate draft articles on the situation of dual ormultiple nationals and on denationalization in relation to expulsion, while others had shared the Special Rapporteur ' s view that there was no need for draft articles dealing with those questions, without necessarily supporting his analysis.
JS1 stated that, although constitutional and legislative progress had been made in the 2009- 2013 period, discriminatory measures and practices persisted towards children of Haitian immigrants born in Dominican territory, who were denied the right to nationality and faced deficiencies in the civil register, the implementation of the birth register(" Immigration Registry"),administrative denationalization and discriminatory policies by the Dominican State.
Some delegations agreed with the Commission 's conclusion that States should not use denationalization as a means of circumventing their obligations under the principle of the non-expulsion of nationals, and a proposal was made to include a draft article to that effect.
