Examples of using Draft model regulations in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Draft model regulations(A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.44/Add.2).
The Working Group next turned to a discussion of the draft model regulations.
It was noted that in article 8, subparagraph(b), of the draft model regulations caution should be exercised so that it would not deter the utilization of electronic registries.
The Working Group engaged in a discussion of the key concepts and issues addressed in the draft model regulations.
It was noted that, with regard to article 10 of the draft model regulations, reference might be made to article 10 of the ECC.
(a) With respect to identifiers for trusts and insolvency estates,paragraph 25 should be aligned with article 22 of the draft model regulations;
Registration of security rights in movable assets: draft model regulations(A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.46/Add.3).
It was stated that that approach was appropriate as the definitions werenecessary for the reader to understand the draft recommendations(and any draft model regulations).
In that connection,the Working Group took note with interest of the draft model regulations contained in document A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.44/Add.2.
(b) The draft model regulations should provide flexible guidance with alternatives to accommodate the various approaches taken by States that were consistent with the law recommended in the Guide;
With respect to article 32, it was widely felt that it should be deleted and placed in the commentary as it dealt with substantivelaw issues that did not belong in the draft model regulations.
(a) Definitions should be included in the draft model regulations, in particular, on terms not addressed in the terminology of the Guide, which should be incorporated in an appropriate way;
The Working Group considered notes by the Secretariat entitled" Draft Security Rights Registry Guide"(A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.46 and Addenda 1 to 2)and" Draft Model Regulations"(A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.46/Add.3).
The Working Group requested the Secretariat to revise all draft model regulations, taking into account the views expressed and the suggestions made during the discussion of the regulations and the commentary of the registration text.
The Working Group had before it the following documents: A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.45(Provisional Agenda), A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.46 and Addenda 1 to 2(Draft Security Rights Registry Guide)and A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.46/Add.3(Draft Model Regulations).
With respect to all other references in the draft model regulations to serial number assets(the relevant definitions, articles 15, paragraph 2, 26, paragraph 2 and 33,subparagraph(b)), it was suggested that they should be retained in square brackets.
With respect to articles 19-21, it was suggested that they might be recast to:(a) explain more clearly that the issue of who was thegrantor was a matter for substantive law, while the draft model regulations could deal with information to be included in a notice and with search criteria; and(b) focus on the search criteria rather than on how registrants should fill out notices.
It was noted that, in articles 21 and 22 of the draft model regulations, caution should be exercised so as to avoid limiting the methods through which grantor information might be entered into the registry record, as this could be contrary to the technological neutrality principle.
The Commission further noted that, at its nineteenth session, the Working Group had completed the first reading of thedraft Security Rights Registry Guide and draft Model Regulations(A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.46 and Add.1-3) and had requested the Secretariat to prepare a revised version reflecting the deliberations and decisions of the Working Group(A/CN.9/719, para. 12).
Recalling its decision taken at its twenty-fourth session(see A/CN.9/796, para. 90), the Working Group considered chapter IV with a view to determining which articles should be included in the draft Model Law andwhich articles should be included in a draft model regulation to be set out in an annex to the draft Model Law(see A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.59/Add.1).
Moreover, it was widely felt that a distinction betweenlegal issues that should be addressed in the draft Model Law and technical issues that should be addressed in a draft model regulation to be set out in an annex to the draft Model Law would make it easier for the Working Group to make progress with its work to prepare a simple, short and concise draft model law.
Draft amendments to the Model Regulations annexed to the tenth.
Draft amendments to the Model Regulations annexed to the tenth revised edition.
Draft amendments to the Model Regulations annexed to the tenth revised edition of the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods(ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.10).
Draft amendments related to Class 7 of the Model Regulations annexed.
This initiative mirrors a similar decisiontaken in Australia approximately two years ago to draft the ADG Code into national uniform model regulations.
In addition, it was agreed that, where the draft Registry Guide offered options,examples of model regulations could be included in an annex to the draft Registry Guide.
In addition, the Working Group agreed that, where the draft Registry Guide offered options,examples of model regulations could be included in an annex to the draft Registry Guide.