Examples of using Elsayed in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Mostafa Elsayed.
Elsayed Mohamed Shehata.
Sherif Elsayed- Ali.
Elsayed Mohamed Osman Elmirghani, Cairo, Egypt 15 February 1997 National Democratic Alliance.
Ashraf Elsayed.
Tarek Elsayed Mohamed Ismail(Egypt).
Hisham Eissa Elsayed.
Sherif Elsayed Abulazm.
Sudan Sayed Galal Eldin Elsayed Elamin.
Imam Shaker Elsayed says his Islamic center invites Christian and Jewish Americans to Iftar dinner every Wednesday as a way of interfaith dialogue during Ramadan.
Montaser Elsayed Ibrahim.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that it was normal for draft article 85 to refer to" vessel owners" if the vessel owner was the same person as the person mentioned in the contract of carriage.
Abdul Rahman Abdul Sattar Elsayed Abu Rawash.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that the chapeau of paragraph 1 should be amended to state that the right of control might be exercised by the controlling party so long as it did not change the contract of carriage.
A third member, Khalda Elsayed, was detained and released on bail.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that the wording of subparagraph(c)(ii) opened the door for substitution of goods and smuggling, and in fact similar cases had been heard before Egyptian and Jordanian courts.
Mr. Ibrahima Khalil Diallo(Senegal), Mr. Elsayed(Egypt), Mr. Imorou(Benin), Ms. Wakarima Karigithu(Kenya), Mr. Sharma(India) Mr. Ngoy Kasongo(Observer for the Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Mr. Moulopo(Observer for the Congo), expressed support for the proposal.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that draft article 16 envisaged a situation in which the carrier did not realize that the goods posed a potential danger; the situation envisaged in draft article 18 was quite different.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that in light of the explanation provided by the representative of Germany, he was prepared to support the proposal, since it would ensure a fairer balance between the parties to the contract.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that he shared the concerns expressed by the representative of Australia about binding a person by an exclusive choice of court agreement when that person had not been a party to the agreement.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) proposed that, since draft articles 27 and 12 both dealt with the period of responsibility of the carrier, draft article 27 should be deleted and the text combined with that of draft article 12.
Mr. Imorou(Benin), Mr. Elsayed(Egypt), Ms. Czerwenka(Germany), Mr. Sharma(India) and Ms. Talbot(Observer for New Zealand) said that they associated themselves with the delegations that had called for the deletion of draft article 36.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that his delegation would like to insert a provision between paragraphs 2 and 3 to the effect that, if there were no goods of the same kind and quality at the place of delivery, a competent court would determine the amount of compensation.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that his delegation agreed with the Chairperson ' s suggestion and, as representative of the States belonging to the Council of Arab Ministers of Transport, wished to participate in efforts to improve the wording of draft article 49.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) drew attention to a discrepancy between the English term" general average" and the term used in the Arabic version of draft article 86 and said that his delegation thought that a definition of" general average" would be useful.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that his delegation would prefer to begin paragraph 3 with wording along the lines of" Unless the claimant proves that the carrier is at fault…"; however, the best solution would be to delete the entire paragraph, as the representative of Senegal had proposed.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that his delegation advocated the deletion of draft article 13 because its wording was not consistent with the other provisions of the draft convention: it did not specify the rights or liabilities of the contracting parties and was actually detrimental to the shipper.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) reminded the Commission that the views he expressed were those of all the members of the League of Arab States and stressed the key role of maritime transport companies, which rendered valuable services to developed and developing countries alike.
Mr. Elsayed(Egypt) said that, as it stood, paragraph 3 was unacceptable because it was open to differing interpretations and because it took into account only the obligations of the carrier, without considering the possible responsibilities of a third party under a prior contract concluded between the two.
Mr. Elsayed( Egypt) endorsed the proposal made by the representative of Senegal and stressed the need for providing details such as the place and date of issuance of the transport document, the name and address of the carrier, the value of the goods, the place of delivery of goods, a sufficient description of potentially dangerous goods and the number of originals of the document.