Examples of using First interrogation in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
This isn't my first interrogation.
First interrogation of the suspect; July, 12th fortnight.
You have the transcript of his first interrogation?
This is not my first interrogation by the Republican Guard.
It feels like I have been asleep in a state of torpor since the first interrogation.
During the first interrogation, the youngest amongst them declared.
Many files consist mainly of a record drawn up following the first interrogation.
Oh, about that, the first interrogation ever, where the import was wrong!
Defence counsel is entitled to meet the suspected oraccused individual even before the first interrogation.
In the first interrogation of Wade Crewes, they served him his coffee in a disposable cup.
In addition, Mr. Kodirov was systematicallyrepresented by a lawyer, including during his first interrogation.
The law established that a first interrogation must be conducted within 48 hours of the arrest.
The individual concerned must be brought to the nearest police station,where a procès-verbal of the first interrogation is established.
It should be noted that during the first interrogation, on 7 May, the lawyers of Mr. and Ms. Gbagbo were not present.
Victims should be informed as to their essential rights and the prerequisites for assistance during proceedings,and prior to their first interrogation at the latest.
AD/01C stated that during the first interrogation he was verbally threatened and in the subsequent two he was blindfolded and beaten.
Although this report does not mention the time when it was drawn up, the State party maintains that the author was explained his rights as a suspect andhad a meeting with the lawyer before his first interrogation.
He also claims that a police official admits that during the first interrogation two of the policemen in charge of the investigation provided the judge with information and advice.
Paragraph IV, subparagraph 1, of Article 19," Security of the right to receive legal aid and the right to defence", of the new Criminal Procedure Code provides that"[t]he organ executing the criminal process should secure the following rights of the suspected person or the defendant: to receive legal assistance from the moment of apprehension or arrest, or,for suspected persons, before the first interrogation, and for defendants at the moment of arraignment.".
The State party submits that the record of Mr. Darwish ' s first interrogation, on 30 January 1992, at 10.35 p.m., shows that he was informed of the reasons for his arrest.
In addition, during the first interrogation as suspect, Mr. Butaev was informed of his procedural rights; the criminal case file contains the corresponding form signed by him.
All detainees interviewed by the Special Rapporteurindicated that they had feared at the time of arrest or first interrogation being subjected to ill-treatment if they did not comply with their investigators ' requests.
Also, contrary to provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code,he was not informed before the first interrogation what crime he was suspected of having committed, and the first page of the first interrogation protocol was not signed by him.
As to the author ' s allegations summarised in paragraph 3.2(a),(d) and(f) above, the State party refers to the report of 27 December 1999 preceding the author 's first interrogation as a suspect, which bears the author ' s signature and has the following text written by him.
Lastly, as regards the absence of any counsel of his own choosing during his first interrogation, the State party says that, besides the fact that he never raised the issue at the domestic level, the author simply refused to make a statement.
While some officials said that a lawyer should be provided immediately to any person under arrest,or at least during the first interrogation, the head of the Law Enforcement Bodies Department affirmed that a lawyer must be provided after the initial 48 hours.
With respect to the author ' s allegations that there was a violation of article 14, paragraphs 1 and 3(b),because he did not have a lawyer of his own choosing during his first interrogation, and because of the hostile and coercive police presence, the Committee takes note of the State party ' s observations to the effect that the author was assisted by counsel of his own choosing during the trial and that he refused to make a statement during the interrogation stage.
As to the author ' s allegations summarized in paragraph 3.2(a),(d) and(f) above, the State party refers to the report of 27 December 1999 preceding the author 's first interrogation as a suspect, which bears the author ' s signature and has the following text written by him:" I was explained my rights as a suspect.
Under the recent amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law,lawyers were permitted to meet detainees in the presence of police officers“following the first interrogation”. However, the provisions were also said to allow persons to be held without notification of the detention to family members or legal representatives if“this notification hinders the investigation of the crimes or cases”.