Examples of using Forest types in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Develop funding mechanisms that are specific for different purposes and different forest types.
However, some forest types are disproportionally represented or still underrepresented.
Almost 20 classes have been detected distinguishing different forest types in combination with forest management practices.
The database on forest types in both developed and developing countries is uneven.
That average figure reflects considerable variationbetween different regions and nations and between different forest types and ecosystems.
Some forest types are of much greater relative importance for the biodiversity they contain; others are not.
Parties may choose touse several definitions of forest to account for different forest types in their country in accordance with their national circumstances.
These forest types will require special attention in future analyses of protection and environmental sustainability.
However, ongoing studies using data from a thematic mapper have shown that a forest register can be produced that contains abasin-by-basin inventory of forest estates categorized by forest types.
Many of the forest types in these countries are distinctive or even rare, while the proportion included in nationally designated protected areas is often below average.
At the same time,participants highlighted the requirements of this approach for detailed information on forest types, number of trees and species, and for taking into consideration regional differences.
Strengthening coordination between national inventories, including those by bio-geographical zones(e.g. boreal, temperate,Mediterranean and others) and by forest types; and.
At these margins rare populations, species, communities and forest types are at the limits of their geographic ranges and often at the limits of their eco-physiological adaptations.
Forest types of particular importance to biodiversity conservation or rural livelihoods, such as mangrove, tropical and boreal forests, will be especially affected from a combination of factors.
To avoid alarmist or misleading awareness campaigns, they need reliable andrepresentative information- e.g., on various forest types(boreal, temperate, tropical, wet, dry, natural, plantations, monocultures);
Forest types of importance for biodiversity conservation, such as tropical montane cloud forests, mangrove forests and riparian forests, will require particular attention in future protection analyses.
It is a major challenge to develop and implement harvesting andsilvicultural practices that protect vulnerable species and forest types in order to maintain the natural diversity of native forest cover types. .
Moreover, many of the forest types in these countries are distinctive or even rare, and require national as well as international protective measures, while the proportion included in nationally designated protected areas is often below average.
Internationally agreed forest classifications, and relevant discussions on harmonization of forest-related definitions(FAO, 2004), accordingto ecological domain, ecological zones and forest types are valid also for LFCCs.
Moreover, many of the forest types in those countries are distinctive or even rare, and require national protective measures and international support, while the proportion included in nationally designated protected areas is often below average.
The northern spotted owl primarily inhabits old-growth forests in the northern part of its range(Canada to southern Oregon)and landscapes with a mix of old and younger forest types in the southern part of its range(Klamath region and California).
The selection and management of additional protected forest areas should be based on their value as representative orunique forest types; their potential to generate information on ecological processes; the conservation of biological diversity and ecosystem services; and due consideration to the livelihoods of the communities depending on them.
However, as the example of sustainable forest management labelling highlighted, the actual specifications in the standard are extremely important because theymust be suited to local conditions(e.g. forest types, soil characteristics, land rights).
For instance,clear-cutting normally has a detrimental effect on late-successional and old-growth forest types composed of long-lived, shade-tolerant trees and associated/dependant species. However, these late-successional forest types are recognized as an important component of forest biodiversity.
Establishment of a global database of definitions e.g. by the FAO in collaboration with the other CPF members,including a common definition of forest degradation and forest types, and making information broadly available e.g. through the web; and.
Information from reporting on biodiversity-related conventions and agreements,and research studies also indicates that some forest types are disproportionally represented or underrepresented in forest-protected areas, such as wetlands, tropical deciduous/semi-deciduous broadleaf forest, temperate deciduous broadleaf forest, and tropical lowland evergreen broadleaf rain forest. .
Internationally, despite the numerous initiatives taken at the national, regional and international levels in support of forest conservation and protected forest areas,there is a need for many additional areas in many countries and forest types.
According to the Biomass Energy Resource Center, the assumption of carbon neutrality“has shifted to a recognition that the carbon implications of biomassdepend on how the fuel is harvested, from what forest types, what kinds of forest management are applied, and how biomass is used over time and across the landscape.”.
In this regard, it should be emphasized that the special session of the ninth session of the Forum on Forests, held in October 2009, set in motion a process to find a concrete solution on forest financing that would be comprehensive and cover financing challenges for all aspects offorests in all geographic regions and for all forest types.
As requested by the Panel at its second session, the terminology used in the present document has been analysed and modified so as to be consistent with that used in the Forest Principles 2/ andin chapter 11 of Agenda 21. 1/ It covers all forest types and utilization patterns in developing countries, developed countries and countries with economies in transition.
