Examples of using Future protocol in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Political
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Dates of future Protocol meetings.
Weapons that do not pose realhumanitarian problems have no place then in the future protocol;
Possible future Protocol to the Convention on Matters specific to Agricultural, Construction and Mining Equipment.
One country foundit inefficient to establish a separate multilateral consultative process in a future protocol.
While some delegates considered that the future protocol should have a wide scope, others preferred a more focused protocol. .
People also translate
The representative of the Philippines proposed topostpone consideration of this chapter until the end of the discussion on the future protocol.
The view was expressed that the future protocol itself was not technically and logically tenable for the aims and purpose proposed.
He further stated that it was the understanding of his delegation that States parties would not be required to legislate afresh in order toreproduce the exact words of the definitions contained in any future Protocol.
The title could be interpreted as meaning that the future Protocol can only include provisions regarding the use of mines that are the subject of the Protocol. .
States shall support and encourage the activity of relevant international and non-governmental organizations and shall closely cooperate with them,with a view to better accomplish the purpose of the future Protocol.".
That delegation also expressed the view that the future protocol would not conflict with the regulations of the International Telecommunication Union(ITU), taking note of the replies by ITU to the Legal Subcommittee.
At the Fifth Review Conference of the BTWC in 2001, Croatia supported the continuation of the work of the Ad Hoc Group, on the basis of the Ad Hoc Group Chairman 's composite text on the future Protocol.
Those delegations also expressed the view that the future protocol might require the Secretary-General to seek or receive instructions from external authorities and thus would conflict with Article 100 of the Charter of the United Nations.
Despite the complexity of the issue, a large number of States had participated actively in the negotiations of the Group of Governmental Experts,especially States whose accession to a future protocol would make a significant impact on the ground.
Some delegations expressed the view that, with regard to the relationship between the future protocol and the legal regime on outer space, the principles of public international law contained in the outer space treaties should prevail.
He stated that the option of including a provision on permissible reservations in an optional protocol could be explored, andsupported a comprehensive approach to the scope of rights to be included in any future protocol.
That delegation further expressed the view that, with regard to the relationship between the future protocol and the legal regime governing outer space, the principles of public international law contained in the outer space treaties should prevail.
The aforementioned aspects have been guiding our analysis and discussions with the spirit of achieving a fine balance between legitimate security needs of the States andhumanitarian concerns so that any future protocol on AVMs attains universal acceptance.
The future protocol was likely to contain an article spelling out in detail how developing countries could fulfil their commitments under the Convention, along with a proposal to allow Parties to set targets for themselves and a provision for review of commitments.
The Committee noted that the Legal Subcommittee had considered the question of the appropriateness of theUnited Nations serving as the supervisory authority under the future protocol and that consensus regarding that critical question could not be reached.
However, the Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia considers that the future Protocol should primarily include provisions for the strengthening of existing humanitarian standards and for the prevention of various forms of abuse of children in armed conflicts for the purpose of attaining political goals.
The view was expressed that progress made at the last session of the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law(Unidroit)committee of governmental experts indicated that the future protocol would not be incompatible with the legal regime applicable to outer space.
Some delegations expressed the view that it was vital to emphasize in the future protocol the public nature of the services that satellites carried, particularly in developing countries, and that safeguards should be put in place to protect the vital national interests of those States in case of default.
The observer for Brazil, supported by the representatives of Argentina, China, Cuba, El Salvador, Peru and Venezuela and the observers for Paraguay and the Dominican Republic, stated that his delegation considered it crucial that the question ofchild sex tourism be included in the future protocol.
Some delegations expressed the view that the Convention and the future protocol would neither undermine nor compromise existing principles of international space law and that, in case of conflict, the norms of public international law contained in the United Nations treaties on outer space would prevail.
(a) Report of the open-ended ad hoc working group on the question of the appropriateness of theUnited Nations serving as the supervisory authority under the future protocol on matters specific to space assets, submitted by the Netherlands as coordinator of the working group(A/AC.105/C.2/L.256);
Some delegations expressed the view that the future protocol was intended to address only the distinct and important issue of financing for commercial space activities and not to affect the rights and obligations of parties to the outer space treaties or the rights and obligations of States members of ITU under its Constitution, Convention and Regulations.
Some delegations expressed the view that,if the United Nations assumed the role of supervisory authority under the future protocol, then it would be crucial to ensure that start-up funds were provided from voluntary funds assigned in advance and not from the regular budget of the United Nations.
Some delegations expressed the view that the future protocol was intended to address only the distinct and important issue of financing for commercial space activities and not to affect the rights and obligations of parties to the outer space treaties or the rights and obligations of States members of ITU under its Constitution and Convention and its Regulations.
Some delegations expressed the view that theConvention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment and the future protocol to the Convention would contribute to the expansion of the space activities of developing countries, as well as developed countries, by reducing the financial risks and burdens arising from such an increase in space activities.