Examples of using Had submitted data in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Political
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
As at December 2001, 65 Governments had submitted data.
Turkey had submitted data for 2005 reporting consumption of bromochloromethane again in excess of the Protocol ' s requirement.
As of 1 November 2008,65 Member States(34 per cent) had submitted data from any prior year.
Uganda had submitted data for 2005, reporting methyl bromide consumption of 6.000 ODP-tonnes, consistent with its consumption reduction commitment.
Before the session of the 2004 Working Group on Contingent-Owned Equipment,32 Member States had submitted data.
The representative of the Secretariat explained that Turkey had submitted data showing consumption of bromochloromethane of 16.44 ODP-tonnes in 2004.
The Maldives had submitted data for 2004, reporting zero consumption of CFCs, which is consistent with its plan of action commitments and in advance of its CFC phase-out obligations under the Protocol.
Since the paper was produced the pace of implementation had been rapid andthe number of countries that had submitted data had risen from 38 to 71, which represented approximately $ 140 million in recorded assets.
Nepal had submitted data for 2005, reporting zero consumption of CFCs and the release on to its domestic market of 12 ODP-tonnes of CFCs from the previously seized quantity.
At its last meeting,the Committee noted with appreciation that Kazakhstan had submitted data for 2003 that was consistent with the consumption reduction benchmarks contained in decision XIII/19 for that year.
Maldives had submitted data for 2005, reporting zero consumption of CFCs, in accordance with its commitment contained in decision XV/37 and in advance of the Protocol ' s CFC consumption control measures.
The World Chlorine Council, representing industries that were responsible for85 per cent of global chlorine production, had submitted data which demonstrated a reduction in emissions from 23 metric tonnes per year in 2002 to 9 metric tonnes in 2008.
Whereas in 2007, there had been an increase, compared with 2006, in the number of allegations arising in entities other than peacekeeping, in 2008, there was a decline in thenumber of allegations reported with respect to entities that had submitted data in 2007.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines had submitted data for 2005, reporting CFC consumption of 1.028 ODP-tonnes, in advance of the consumption reduction commitment.
Paragraph 8 of Article 4 provided that exports of ozone-depleting substances such as HCFCs might be permitted to any State not party to the Protocol if that State was determined, by the Meeting of the Parties, to be in full compliance with Article 2, Articles 2A-2I and Article 4, and had submitted data to that effect as specified in Article 7.
With regard to timeliness of reporting,another Committee member expressed concern that several parties had submitted data after the deadline of 30 September, so that the latest data offered by the Secretariat did not reflect the true compliance situation.
Papua New Guinea had submitted data for 2005, reporting CFC consumption of 15.056 ODPtonnes, which was in advance of the consumption reduction commitment contained in its plan of action for that year and also of its CFC phase-out obligations under the Protocol.
In providing further clarification, the Secretariat confirmed that only four of the Parties, namely, Libya, Mauritania,Papua New Guinea and Saudi Arabia, had submitted data for 2012 that confirmed that the Parties were in full compliance with all the control measures applicable to parties operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5, which was one of the prerequisites for exceptions under paragraph 8 of Article 4.
Decision XVI/21 recalled that, under decision X/20, the Party had committed itself, among other things, to a complete phase-out of Annex A group I substances(CFCs) by 1 January 2001 in order to return to compliance with its Protocol obligations,and noted with great concern that Azerbaijan had submitted data for 2001-2003 that placed it in non-compliance with this commitment.
Under decision XV/28,the Meeting of the Parties had noted that Azerbaijan had submitted data for 2001- 2002 showing that it was in non-compliance with its commitment to phase out CFCs and had not yet reported on its commitment to ban halon imports.
The latter document lists those Parties that, as of a given date, had submitted data that deviated from the Protocol ' s control measures and those Parties that, as of the same date, had not fulfilled their base-year, baseline data or annual datareporting obligations.
The former document contains information on those Parties that,as of a given date, had submitted data that deviated from the Protocol ' s control measures and indicated possible non-compliance with those control measures(in other words, that did not include those deviations that are exempted or otherwise approved by the Meetings of the Parties).
To note with appreciation that several Parties have submitted data for their base years following the adoption of decision XIV/15;
Secondly, we should enhance the effectiveness of the United Nations Registerof Conventional Arms. For the calendar year 1994, only 83 Member States have submitted data.
The Montreal Protocol, as a means of encouraging States to become parties to it, prohibits trade in substances controlled by the Protocol with nonparties except when the Meeting of the Parties determines that a non-party is in compliance with the Protocol 's control measures and has submitted data to that effect.
(i) Non-parties in compliance with control measures: Parties may allow the import and export of specified mercury-containing compounds and mercury-added products with States not party to the mercury instrument if the conference of the parties determines that the Stateis in compliance with the control measures of the instrument, and has submitted data to that effect(Montreal Protocol article 4, paragraph 8);
Noting also that Article 4, paragraph 8 of the Protocol permits Parties to the Beijing Amendment to import and export hydrochlorofluorocarbons from" any State not party to this Protocol, if that State is determined, by a Meeting of the Parties, to be in full compliance with Article 2, Articles 2A-to 2I and this Article, and have submitted data to that effect as specified in Article 7".
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Article, imports and exports referred to in paragraphs 1 to 4 ter of this Article may be permitted from, or to, any State not party to this Protocol, if that State is determined, by a meeting of the Parties, to be in full compliance with Article 2,Article 2A to 2I and this Article, and have submitted data to that effect as specified in Article 7.".