Examples of using Mercury problem in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Strategy Proposal for International Actions to Address Mercury Problem- Mercury Situation in China, 2008.
Several features of the mercury problem suggest that particular attention should be paid to the question of compliance in formulating a global response.
(f) Result in overall fragmentation and an uncoordinated approach for addressing the mercury problem on a global, long-term basis;
(c) Be readily adaptable to changes in the mercury problem without requiring extensive ratification and amendment procedures;
(f) Result in overall fragmentation and an uncoordinated approach for addressing the mercury problem on a global, long-term basis;
(c) Be readily adaptable to changes in the mercury problem without requiring extensive ratification and amendment procedures;
This risk of opportunism is heightened by thefact that the economic costs and benefits of addressing the mercury problem may be unevenly distributed.
However, the countries are of the view thatLRTAP is not a final solution to the mercury problem, and that urgent actions should be taken at global, regional and national level to prevent negative effects posed by mercury and its compounds.
The tables are intended to provide the OEWG with a useful, readily available compilation of actions that stakeholdersmight take to address a particular aspect of the mercury problem.
Elements that frame the issue by providing context for the mercury problem and confirming the intent of Governments to address it;
The framework might typically contain a mixture of" hard"(mandatory) and" soft"(discretionary) commitments that, together,could comprehensively address the full scope of the global mercury problem.
This category iscomprised of elements that would provide context for the mercury problem and confirm the intent of Governments(and possibly other stakeholders) to address it.
The framework will contain a mixture of" hard"(mandatory) and" soft"(discretionary) commitments that, together,could comprehensively address the full scope of the global mercury problem, as below.
Initiating a process to assist countries in understanding the nature andmagnitude of the mercury problem and in developing tools and strategies to mitigate mercury pollution.
An MEA would therefore ensure broad participation also of developing countries(DC)/countries in transition(CiT) together with the setting of incentives for ownership and capacity building,thus helping to control the global mercury problem;
One of the important issues related to establishing of globalmercury convention is the understanding of the global mercury problem and its potential solutions by policy makers in individual countries and their political will to agree on reduction of Hg emissions and exposures.
Decision 24/3 IV thus demonstrates the Governing Council ' s concurrent commitments to continue elaborating the Partnership Programme and to explore the possibility of taking additional measures, including legally binding ones,for dealing with the global mercury problem.
Interim, voluntary mercury mitigation measures could be desirable between GC-25 and an instrument ' s entry-into-force date,both to address the mercury problem now, and to begin establishing procedures and mechanisms that could contribute to successful implementation of the instrument.
We must make sure that the Governing Council next February is well placed to reach a sound decision which will enable us now to make rapid progress to implement practical andeffective global actions to address the mercury problem which we have all recognised.
Therefore, interim, voluntary mercury mitigation measures could be desirable between GC-25 and an instrument ' s entry-into-force date,both to address the mercury problem now, and to begin establishing procedures and mechanisms that could contribute to successful implementation of the instrument.
(g) Some countries have developed guidance materials and have also presented reports or carried out information and awarenessraising events dealing with sources, pathways,adverse impacts on human health and the environment and action in relation to the mercury problem in their countries;
In the first instance, Governments might consider the need for priority action based on how polluting or threatening to human health and the environment a product orproduct group is, or how much of the mercury problem is related to the production, use or disposal of a mercury-added product or group.
Despite data gaps, sufficient understanding has been developed of mercury, including knowledge of its fate and transport, health and environmental impacts and the role of human activity, based on extensive research over half a century,to support the conclusion that international actions to address the global mercury problem must not be delayed.
(c) Some Governments believe that the best way forward in dealing with global mercury pollution is to develop alegally binding instrument to address all aspects of the mercury problem and eventually also other heavy metals(see subsection(c) below).
As a result of these activities, substantial funding has been raised for the general trust fund in support of activities on mercury and other metals. Funding is now available to support a number of partnership activities and the implementation of country-based projects at the national or regional levels, aimed at assisting developing countries and countries with economies in transition in understanding the nature andmagnitude of the mercury problem and in developing tools and strategies to mitigate mercury pollution.
China, he said, would continue to support strongly the UNEP Global Mercury Partnership and seek to find commonalities with other countries in a search for feasible and realistic measures to address the global mercury problem while bearing in mind national circumstances.
Two representatives of international coalitions of non-governmental organizations stated that a global legally binding instrument supported by an adequate financial mechanism would be needed in order to deal effectively andcomprehensively with the mercury problem and that voluntary measures should be seen as purely complementary.
The problem was mercury poisoning.