Examples of using Recognition of foreign certificates in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Recognition of foreign certificates.
The Working Group considered at length the appropriate threshold for the recognition of foreign certificates.
Recognition of foreign certificates.
Substantive equivalence Consistent with a long-standing tradition, UNCITRAL declined toendorse geographic considerations when proposing factors for recognition of foreign certificates and electronic signatures.
Recognition of foreign certificates and electronic signatures.
Although a large number of countries had enacted legislation recognizing thevalidity of e-signatures, progress was still lacking in the cross-border recognition of foreign certificates and e-signatures.
Recognition of foreign certificates and electronic signatures 25-58 6.
Therefore, the suggestion was made that the scope of paragraph(1)should be confined to the recognition of foreign certificates and that the words" or an electronic signature", which currently appeared within square brackets, should be deleted.
The recognition of foreign certificates is often achieved by a method called" cross certification".
In addition,it was stated that to include these factors only in provisions addressing recognition of foreign certificates and signatures might lead to discrimination and thus run counter to the principle stated in paragraph(1).
The recognition of foreign certificates is often achieved by a method called" cross certification".
At the close of the discussion of paragraph 82, it was suggested that a subsection should beadded to section IV to reflect non-discrimination and recognition of foreign certificates as one of the main features of the Model Law.
Article 12. Recognition of foreign certificates and electronic signatures.
The suggestion was made that the uniform rules should include a definition of" recognized international standards",an expression which was used in connection with the recognition of foreign certificates and electronic signatures(see above, paras. 46-49).
It was suggested that the criteria for recognition of foreign certificates in draft article 13, and perhaps the responsibilities of an information certifier in draft article 12, could furnish useful additional criteria against which to measure reliability.
The professionals involved in disaster relief-- such as doctors, nurses, drivers and pilots-- are generally subject to country-specific licensing regimes, and indeed several regional conventions have been concluded whichdeal with the question of recognition of foreign certificates and diplomas.
As a general comment, it was stated by a number of delegations that paragraph(1)already contained the fundamental principles to be followed in respect of the recognition of foreign certificates and electronic signatures, so that paragraph(2) and the remainder of draft article 13 were not necessary.
With regard to the title of chapter IV, it was said that the reference therein to recognition of foreign electronic signatures was not appropriate, since the chapter dealt with the provision of services by foreign certification authorities(i.e. draft article 17), the endorsement of foreign certificates by domesticcertification authorities(i.e. draft article 18) and the recognition of foreign certificates(i.e. draft article 19).
The Working Group held an extensive discussion on the relevance of the criteria set forth in paragraph(4)for the purpose of cross-border recognition of foreign certificates and signatures, and the need for retaining such a provision in view of the amendments that had been agreed to in paragraphs(2) and(3).
Another comment was that, although the essence of paragraph(2) was satisfactory, its purpose would be better served if paragraph(2) would clearly provide forthe legal effectiveness, rather than the recognition, of foreign certificates issued in accordance with practices found to be substantially equivalent to those required in the enacting State.
It was not the intention of draft article 12 to impose or exclude any of such approaches butrather to set forth criteria for the recognition of foreign certificates and electronic signatures, which would be valid and pertinent regardless of the nature of the certification scheme obtaining in the jurisdiction from which the certificate or signature emanated.
For the same reasons, where the use of electronic signature and authentication methods, or the activities of certification services providers, is provided for by legislation,the law typically subjects recognition of foreign certificates or certification services providers to some assessment of substantive equivalence with the reliability offered by domestic certificates and certification services providers.
Furthermore, it was said that paragraph(2) might have unintended discriminatory effects, since the references in italics to legalrequirements in the enacting State appeared to link the recognition of foreign certificates or electronic signatures to the existence of a governmental licensing regime for certification authorities(the concept of" certification authority" was later replaced by that of" certification service provider" by the Working Group: see below, paras. 66 and 89).
The Working Group considered briefly a number of suggestions that were made so as to reflect more clearly in the chapterheading the subject matter dealt with therein(e.g.“cross-border recognition of certificates”,“recognition of electronic signatures and certificates”,“recognition of foreign certification authorities and certificates”).
Other legal techniques through which advance recognition of the reliability of foreign certificates and signatures might be made by an enacting State could include unilateral declarations or treaties.
In the context of that discussion, another suggestion was made that the Guide shouldindicate that a principle of reciprocity should govern the recognition of the legal effectiveness of foreign certificates.
Carrying out the groundwork for the recognition of foreign diplomas, certificates and qualifications;
In terms of the relationship of paragraph(1) to Variants A and B, support was expressed for the view that only paragraph(1)was required in order to address the issue of recognition of foreign signatures and certificates. .
In the absence of an international PKI,a number of concerns could arise with respect to the recognition of certificates by certification authorities in foreign countries.
In any event, in the absence of an international PKI,a number of concerns may arise with respect to the recognition of certificates by certification authorities in foreign countries.