Examples of using Scoping process in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Scoping process.
III. Full scoping process.
These estimates are constantly reviewed throughout the scoping process.
Initial scoping process for thematic and methodological assessments.
II. Suggested approach for the scoping process.
Report on the regional scoping process for a set of regional and subregional assessments(deliverable 2(b)).
It is assumed that assessments will be developed in cooperation with relevant existing institutions and indigenous andlocal communities outlined in the scoping process.
Appendix Possible Platform scoping process flow chart.
A full scoping process can only begin once approved by the Plenary on the basis of the recommendations of the Bureau and the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel.
The Plenary at its third session requests the Panel andthe Bureau to initiate the scoping process and to present the scope for approval at the fourth session of the Plenary.
Once completed, the initial scoping process provides the basis for an initial outline of any Platform assessment report and other deliverables, including a cost estimate.
In decision IPBES/1/2, the Plenary had requested the MultidisciplinaryExpert Panel to recommend a set of procedures and a scoping process for the preparation of the Platform ' s deliverables.
Such a scoping process would draw on and contribute to the catalogue of assessments, and also improve understanding of available information by stakeholders requesting assessments.
It is assumed that the assessments will be developed in close cooperation with relevant existing institutions at the regional and subregional levels,as detailed in the scoping process.
Full scoping is a detailed scoping process, overseen by the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel, involving a scoping workshop with an appropriate range of stakeholders.
The Plenary at its second session, on the basis of a consideration of the deliverable as initially scoped, cost-estimated and presented in the work programme,considers requesting the Panel and the Bureau to undertake a full scoping process in accordance with Platform procedures.
Full scoping is a detailed scoping process, overseen by the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel, involving a scoping workshop with the experts selected by the Panel.
Further consultations with the Convention secretariat are under way in the light of the recent decisions of the Conference of the Parties at its twelfth meeting, which, inter alia, encouraged parties and invited otherGovernments and international organizations to contribute to the global assessment scoping process of the Platform in a timely manner and in accordance with procedures established by the Platform.
In preparing the scoping documents, the Bureau and the Panel followed the scoping process described in document IPBES/2/9, which sets out draft procedures for the preparation of the Platform ' s deliverables.
In its decision IPBES/1/2, the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services requested the secretariat to compile all comments received on the procedures for the preparation of assessments and the review, acceptance, adoption,approval and publication of reports and other deliverables and the scoping process and to prepare a document for consideration by the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel.
In implementing the request, the Panel and the Bureau noted that a regional scoping process was not provided for in the procedures, while a preliminary scoping process and a full scoping process were.
In addition, the Panel agreed that the scoping process, which is intended to guide the development of potential assessments and other Platform activities and is to be applied in accordance with other rules and procedures of the Platform, would form part of the procedures for the preparation of assessments and the review, acceptance, adoption, approval and publication of reports and other deliverables.
The outcome of the joint regional scoping meeting,consisting of a draft report on the regional scoping process and five draft regional scoping reports, was submitted for review by member States, observers and scoping experts in September 2014.
Another critical assumption highlighted by the scoping process is that the assessment will be scale-dependent and that, while undertaken at regional and subregional levels, all scales are equally important for its scope. .
Once requests, inputs and suggestions incorporating relevant pre-scoping material are received from the various Platform constituencies, the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel(for scientific issues) and the Bureau(for administrative issues)perform an initial scoping process prior to potential submission of the proposed activity to the Plenary for its consideration in order to provide sufficient information on the merits of a full scoping exercise.
At the current session, a member of the Panel presented the set of procedures(IPBES/2/9),noting that the scoping process, which was intended to guide the development of potential assessments and other Platform activities and was to be applied in accordance with other rules and procedures of the Platform, would form part of the procedures for the preparation of the Platform ' s deliverables.
In the event that the body of knowledge necessary to respond to requests was not available, the platform 's scoping process could ensure that such requests were passed to the scientific community to be addressed through further research as part of the platform ' s knowledge-generation function.
In decision IPBES-2/5, the Plenary requested the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel andthe Bureau to undertake a regional scoping process, in accordance with the procedures for the preparation of the Platform ' s deliverables set out in the annex to decision IPBES-2/3, for a set of regional and subregional assessments, emphasizing the need to support capacity-building as outlined in objective 1 of the work programme, including by engaging with regional and national institutions and initiatives, for consideration by the Plenary at its third session.