Examples of using Technical standards for data exchange in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Political
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Technical standards for data exchange between registry systems under the Kyoto Protocol.
(a) Inherent limitations of the message flows within technical standards for data exchange, amounting to 60 per cent of the termination causes.
CP.8 Technical standards for data exchange between registry systems under the Kyoto Protocol.
Allow the independent design of individual registry systems that, at minimum,are consistent with the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems.
Adopts the general design requirements for the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems under the Kyoto Protocol, as contained in the annex to decision 24/CP.8;
In addition, this interactive exercise will demonstrate the capacity of the ITL toautomatically perform the key checks defined in the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems.
The technical standards for data exchange between registries use separate account types to distinguish between different causes for replacement and to facilitate tracking of lCERs.
To assess the extent to which the national registry conforms to the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems adopted by the COP/MOP;
Based on decision 24/CP.8 on technical standards for data exchange between registry systems under the Kyoto Protocol, the secretariat was requested to undertake work relating to the functional and technical specifications of the technical standards. .
Description: The exact content of this course willbe determined following completion of the work on technical standards for data exchange between registry systems, as required by decision 24/CP.8.
The SBSTA expressed its appreciation for the contributions made by several Parties to the Trust Fund for Supplementary Activities, and for the pledges of contributions made at this session,for the development of the transaction log and the technical standards for data exchange.
Finally, the secretariat sought tobe consistent with the ongoing development of the ITL and the technical standards for data exchange between national registries, the CDM registry and the ITL.
Background: The COP, by its decision 24/CP.8 on technical standards for data exchange between registry systems under the Kyoto Protocol, recommended that the COP/MOP, at its first session, adopt the general design requirements for standards contained in the annex to that decision.
The modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts under Article 7, paragraph 4,including the requirements for national registries, and the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems under the Kyoto Protocol;
Takes note that the general design requirements of the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems have been elaborated, in accordance with decision 24/CP.8, through the development of detailed functional and technical specifications;
In addition, this second interactive exercise will demonstrate, inter alia, the ability of the ITL toautomatically perform the key checks defined in the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems.
By its decision 24/CP.8,the COP recommended that the COP/MOP adopt the general design requirements for the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems under Article 7, paragraph 4, the Kyoto Protocol.
The results of any test procedures that might be available or developed with the aim of testing the performance, procedures and security measures of the national registry undertakenpursuant to the provisions of decision 19/CP.7 relating to the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems.
The SBSTA welcomed the progress made by the secretariat, in collaboration with technical experts,on the specifications of the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems called for by decision 24/CP.8.
The SBSTA took note of the report on the intersessional consultations on registries, held in Bonn on 2 June 2003, as contained in document FCCC/SBSTA/2003/INF.6, and of the progress made by the secretariat inelaborating the functional specifications of the transaction log and the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems;
Background: The COP, by its decision 24/CP.8, recommended that the COP/MOP, at its first session,adopt the general design requirements for the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems under the Kyoto Protocol.
The ITL administrator conducted the interactive exercise during the thirtieth session of the SBI, as requested by the CMP at its fourth session, demonstrating how the ITL functions with other registry systems, including the registry of the clean development mechanism(CDM), and demonstrating the full conformity of the ITL with relevant decisions,including the key checks defined in the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems(DES).
An understanding of the modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts under Article 7, paragraph 4,including the requirements for national registries, and the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems under the Kyoto Protocol;
In addition, the course provides guidance on the review of national registries, including changes in the national registries reported by the Parties in accordance with decision 15/CMP.1 andconformity with the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems.
The expert review team shall conduct a thorough and comprehensive review of the national registry of each Party included in Annex I. The review of the national registry should cover the extent to which the registry requirements contained in the annex todecision -/CMP.1(Modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts) and the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems adopted by the COP/MOP have been adhered to.
The expert review team shall conduct a thorough and comprehensive review of the national registry of each Party included in Annex I. The review of the national registry should cover the extent to which the registry requirements contained in the annex to decision 13/CMP.1,the annex to decision 5/CMP.1 and the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems adopted by the COP/MOP have been adhered to.
The review of the national registry should cover the extent to which the registry requirements contained in the annex to decision -/CMP.1(Modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts), the annex to decision -/CMP.1(Afforestation andreforestation project activities under the CDM) and the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems adopted by the COP/MOP have been adhered to.
The expert review team shall conduct a thorough and comprehensive review of the national registry of each Party included in Annex I. The review of the national registry should cover the extent to which the registry requirements contained in the annexes to decision -/CMP.1( Modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts), the annex to decision -/CMP.1(Afforestation and reforestation project activities under the CDM) and the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems adopted by the COP/ MOP have been adhered to.
The expert review team shall conduct a thorough and comprehensive review of the national registry of each Party included in Annex I. The review of the national registry should cover the extent to which the registry requirements contained in the annex to decision -/CMP.1( Modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts), the annex to decision -/CMP.1(Afforestation and reforestation project activities under the CDM) and the technical standards for data exchange between registry systems adopted by the COP/ MOP have been adhered to.