Examples of using The state party rejects in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The State party rejects the Committee ' s Views.
The State party rejects this allegation, noting that the author never, before any jurisdiction, requested that her name be suppressed.
Regarding the merits of the communication, the State party rejects any violation of article 15(1).
On the merits, the State party rejects a violation of either article 23, paragraph 1, or article 24, paragraph 1.
People also translate
Contrary to the allegations that the medical consequencessuffered by the complainant are due to torture, the State party rejects any causal link.
On the merits, the State party rejects the author ' s allegations as groundless.
In its submissions dated 30 June,6 October and 13 October 1995, the State party rejects the allegations by CEAR as incorrect and inaccurate.
The State party rejects that the relevant statements by some members of the DPP in any way advocated religious hatred.
Furthermore," in the absence of detailed information", the State party rejects that there has been a violation of article 14, subparagraph 3(b).
The State party rejects this allegation and encloses a statement from the chief of Gandía Police as well as receipts allegedly signed by the authors(see para. 9.5).
Even if their removal was proposed, the State party rejects that a necessary and foreseeable consequence would be torture or analogous treatment in Iraq.
The State party rejects the author ' s allegations in the communication to the Committee, and claims that they are groundless and do not correspond to the reality.
In respect of counsel 's argument concerning article 2 of the Covenant, the State party rejects his suggestion that article 2 can convert laws or Government actions otherwise consistent with the rights and freedoms of the Covenant, into contraventions.
On this basis, the State party rejects the assertions about the author ' s mental health and notes that an allegation of this kind must be supported by medical evidence.
As to article 14, paragraph 5, the State party rejects the author ' s arguments, for each person sentenced to death automatically receives an appeal.
The State party rejects as" totally unjustified" and unsubstantiated the author ' s claim that his right of access has been violated(" Es una… denuncia radicalmente falsa").
As to the identification parade, the State party rejects the authors ' description of having been brought before the witness in handcuffs and next to uniformed policemen.
The State party rejects the author ' s argument that the requirements for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court breach article 14, paragraph 5, on the ground that it is unsubstantiated.
By a note verbale of 13 August 2010, the State party rejects as unfounded the author ' s claim under article 14 of the Covenant that his criminal case was not considered by a competent tribunal.
The State party rejects the author ' s allegation that Chief Justice Elias, who was a member of the Court of Appeal that set aside the author ' s conviction and sentence in March 1999, was subject to bias.
On admissibility, the State party rejects the authors ' claim that their detention was mandatory and in violation of article 7, as inadmissible for lack of substantiation, or alternatively, incompatibility with the Covenant.
The State party rejects the authors ' allegation that they are victims of a violation of article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant and affirms that their cases were in fact properly reviewed by the Court of Appeal.
The State party rejects the author ' s claims that his right to a defence was violated since in 2000- 2002 he was not allowed to familiarize himself with the entire case file and his relatives were not allowed to participate as defenders.
The State party rejects the authors ' complaint that the annuities have been frozen at the level of 1 January 1975, and states that they have been increased with 4,75 per cent on 1 September 1994.
In the same vein, the State party rejects as unfounded and unsubstantiated the authors ' contention that the incidence of cases of cancer has risen in French Polynesia as a result of French nuclear tests in the area.
The State party rejects the allegations regarding the use of unlawful methods of investigation and torture, and explains that neither Mr. Kurbanov nor his lawyer ever complained in this connection during the investigation or in court.
The State party rejects the author ' s view that the principle of equality protected by article 26 of the Covenant is to be interpreted in such a way as to entail a duty to allocate a share of limited resources to all citizens of the State. .
The State party rejects the allegations regarding the use of unlawful methods of investigation including torture, and explains that neither Mr. Aliboev nor his counsel ever complained in this connection during the pretrial investigation or in court.
The State party rejects the authors ' assertion that their situation is the same as that of the doctors under exclusive contract, arguing that they are confusing the different legal situations of the two categories of doctor with their effects in practice.