Examples of using Third-party effectiveness and priority in English and their translations into Chinese
{-}
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Programming
Third-party effectiveness and priority of an acquisition security right in intellectual property.
Conflict-of-laws rules for the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right.
It was further agreed that, to follow a more reader-friendly approach,those articles should be placed in the relevant chapters on third-party effectiveness and priority.
Law applicable to the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in proceeds.
Lex protectionis would apply regarding basic property issues,specifically third-party effectiveness and priority.
Law applicable to the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in tangible assets.
The forum State has to applyother provisions of the applicable law to determine third-party effectiveness and priority.
(c) Special rule for the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in a negotiable instrument.
It was also observed that consequentamendments should be made to the chapters on third-party effectiveness and priority.
Yet another suggestion was that issues of third-party effectiveness and priority should be referred to the law of the same State.
With regard to paragraphs 24 and 25, the problem was that some legal systemsmade no distinction between creation of a security right, third-party effectiveness and priority.
Private international law rules for the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right.
That exception was that third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right as against the security right of a transferee or licensee would normally be subject to the law of the protecting State.
This chapter discusses, in section A. 2,the conflict-of-laws rules for the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in general.
In some States, the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in intangible assets is governed by the law of the States in which the grantor is located.
In other legal systems,the law of the location of the asset still governs the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in intangible assets.
An exception could be made for the third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in intellectual property that could be referred to the lex protectionis(see recommendation 248, option C, below).
In other States, the law of the location of the asset(lex situs)still governs the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in intangible assets.
In either case, recommendation 136 provides that the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of the security right are governed by the law of State of the location of the goods or document.
In some legal systems, the law of the State in which thegrantor is located governs the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in intangible property.
Under recommendation 217,the law of the new location would govern third-party effectiveness and priority, but that rule would leave the first assignee unduly exposed.
This result would also be consistent with the substantivelaw rules proposed by the Guide on creation, third-party effectiveness and priority(see recommendations 28, 52 and 105).
Except in those States that do not distinguish between creation, third-party effectiveness and priority, no additional steps are required since this is an issue of creation, not priority. .
He agreed with the suggestion that the issue might beresolved by exploring whether special rules governing third-party effectiveness and priority should be applicable to such receivables.
However, these principles should notpermit the forum State to apply its own third-party effectiveness and priority rules in the place of those of the applicable law(see recommendation 219).
Accordingly, the law of the State where the instrumentis held will govern the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in a negotiable instrument(see recommendation 200).
Accordingly, the law of the State where the instrumentis held will govern the creation, third-party effectiveness and priority of a security right in a negotiable instrument(see A/CN.9/631, recommendation 202).