Examples of using Contract for difference in English and their translations into Croatian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Contract For Difference(CFD).
First, the Republic of Austria claims that certain questions regarding the Contract for Difference remained open.
With index CFD(Contract for Difference), the investor can buy as well as sell.
Renewable energy producers would be driven out of the market, in the absence of clauses comparable to those contained in the Contract for Difference.
Contract for difference(CFDs) offers you the opportunities of trading shares.
In the third place, the Republic of Austria argues that the Contract for Difference will increase the frequency of negative prices.
Thanks to CFD(Contract for Difference), you can trade with commodities, and you do not even have to own them.
In those recitals,the Commission found that the rates of return on the basis of which the strike price for the Contract for Difference had been calculated were consistent with the set of measures framing it.
Contract For Difference(CFD) What is a contract for difference? Looking for a CFD definition?
The United Kingdom can, however, terminate the Contract for Difference unilaterally, if construction is not completed by the longstop date.
The Contract for Difference does not lay down any specific requirement either as regards the works to be carried out by NNBG, or as regards the electricity to be supplied.
In Section 2.1 of that decision, it describes how the Contract for Difference functions, the effect of that contract being to stabilise prices.
A Forex contract for difference(CFD) is a financial instrument that allows traders to invest in an asset class, namely currency pairs, without actually owning the underlying asset.
In that regard,it should be pointed out at the outset that the Commission described the Contract for Difference in recitals 43 to 49 and 53 to 89 of the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
CFD(Contract for Difference) is a derivative contract that allows to take advantage of price fluctuations of the underlying asset without acquisition of the ownership rights for this asset.
In the second place, the Court must examine whether the Commission should have characterised the Contract for Difference as a works concession within the meaning of Directive 2004/17 or as a public works concession within the meaning of Directive 2004/18.
Last, it should be noted that, in recitals 349 to 362 of the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure, the Commission explained that,on the basis of the information available to it, it could not conclude that the Contract for Difference was a proportionate aid measure.
The argument that the Contract for Difference is discriminatory 690 In connection with the seventh plea, the Republic of Austria puts forward an argument relating to recital 549 of the contested decision.
It follows that the Commission did not make a manifest error of assessment by taking into account the effects of the Contract for Difference when assessing the likelihood of the project's failure, which it did in the context of the evaluation of the Credit Guarantee.
It follows that the Contract for Difference does not impose a binding obligation on NNBG in relation to the execution of works, the supply of products or the provision of services within the meaning of Directive 2004/17 or Directive 2004/18.
However, unlike a non-repayable subsidy, which is granted in full at the outset oron the basis of the progress of construction, a contract for difference has an incentive effect for investments, guaranteeing as it does a specific and stable price.
Third, the Republic of Austria submits that the Contract for Difference allows the strike price to be reopened and that, in that context, account will be taken not only of investment costs but also of operating costs.
As is apparent from recitals 337 and 479 of the contested decision, the Commission took account of the compensation mechanism for changes in law giving rise to a right to compensation when it determined the rates of return andthe adequate strike price envisaged for the Contract for Difference.
The three measures at issue form one unit, and the Contract for Difference and that agreement are intended precisely to overcome the obstacles to investment in new nuclear energy generating capacity identified by the Commission.
The opex reopeners would allow for an increase or decrease of the strike price, on the basis ofknown actual costs and revised predictions of those costs, for certain cost line items determined in the Contract for Difference(see recital 31 of the contested decision).
In the first place, the Republic of Austria submits that the Contract for Difference alters the supply merit curve to the disadvantage of gas power stations, which have high marginal costs and would have difficulty in remaining on the market in 2030.
In that regard, in the first place, it should be borne in mind that the mere fact that the Commission did not quantify in the contested decision the precise amount of the grant equivalent arising from the Contract for Difference is not capable of establishing that the Commission made an error see paragraphs 247 to 256 above.
The aid mechanism of the Contract for Difference, which enables investment to be made, thanks to the guaranteed baseload price, in nuclear energy generating capacity, is capable of influencing the conditions for competition on the United Kingdom energy market.
It is, it claims, highly likely that market prices for electricity will continue to fall andthat the aid paid pursuant to the Contract for Difference will constitute a very high subsidy over the 35 years of energy generation, much higher than envisaged and assessed when the aid mechanism was being established.
In any event, market distortions deriving from the Contract for Difference at the operational level were ve 723 ry limited for nuclear energy generators, which had low marginal operating costs and were therefore likely to sell on the market regardless of price levels and occupied the initial positions in the supply merit curve.