Examples of using Margin of discretion in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Therefore, the wording used should reflect such margin of discretion.
Appropriate margin of discretion, 40to plead and prove that the certificates presented by the importer are forged or falsified.
It should berecalled that Article 72(3) still grants a margin of discretion.
Member States have a margin of discretion in regulating the retail sector, but must not unduly restrict the Single Market freedoms.
I agree with Mr Wibe that this case falls within the cases where the European Parliament has a margin of discretion.
EU spectrum policy could be developed in such a way that EU andMember States keep a margin of discretion to organise the use of the spectrum and their spectrum policy.
Secondly, VAT is not fully deductible under the proposed expenditure rules andMember States retain a margin of discretion.
However, where the Commission has such a margin of discretion, observance of the guarantees conferred by the Community legal order in administrative proceedings acquires more importance.
The proposed instrument is a directive since a regulation might unnecessarily restrict the margin of discretion of Member States.
The Commission has in fact no margin of discretion in this context considering that the related formula is already fixed by the provisions of Article 7(2)of Commission Regulation(EC) 1301/200624.
The EESC urges the Commission to clarify some unclear issues in particular as regards the margin of discretion left to the Member States.
While it is true that the court has a margin of discretion to determine the applicable law under the specific provisions of Articles 4, 5, 10, 11 and 12, the same does not apply to the other rules.
It is an inherent feature of the Commission's task as public enforcer that it has a margin of discretion to set priorities in its enforcement activity 25.
In what areas should the current wide margin of discretion allowed by the Directive's provisions be limited in order to achieve a meaningful level-playing field, at an appropriate standard of treatment?
A recent Italian law, in an attempt to directlyregulate such ancillary services, has in practice pre-empted the margin of discretion of the national regulatory authority AGCOM.
The Commission considers that the margin of discretion left to Member States by the Directive in force is too great, and that this has undermined the objective of ensuring adequate reception conditions for asylum seekers in all Member States.
The Court's strict interpretation of the exception in question enormously reduces both the margin of discretion allowed to Member States and the possibility of avoiding the notification obligation.
That recourse to the concept of public policy is in particular circumstances justified, so thatin certain cases Member States must be allowed a margin of discretion within the limits imposed by the Treaty. 21.
Nevertheless, the Commission considers that the inspector's margin of discretion in selecting the ships to be inspected should in certain cases be considerably reduced in the interests of achieving truly uniform and efficient practices.
That aim of uniform application as regards both the moment when the customs debt is incurred and the application, as in this case,of a possible customs advantage would be jeopardized if the competent national authorities were to be given a margin of discretion allowing the choice of conditions or formalities other than those laid by Directive 79/623.
As support for its complaint that the Court of First Instance did not respect the Commission's margin of discretion and instead substituted its own assessment of the facts and evidence on a number of points, the appellants give the following examples from the judgment under appeal.
The Commission fully respects the principle of subsidiarity andrecognises that Member States have a margin of discretion to protect valid public interest objectives in accordance with the Treaty.
By their fourth ground of appeal the appellants claim that the Court of First Instance exceeded the scope of judicial review by failing to respect the Commission's margin of discretion and, on a number of points, by substituting its own assessment of the facts and of the evidence for that of the Commission; in doing so, the Court itself committed manifest errors and fundamentally misconstrued the evidence. 187.