Examples of using Rather than a directive in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
It's an existential question rather than a directive.
The question could also be raised as to whether- in order toachieve greater certainty and security- the instrument selected could/should be a regulation rather than a directive.
Stakeholders welcomed the proposal for a Regulation rather than a Directive, while Member States were divided.
I did faithfully try in the Environment Committee to get the members to agree to a recommendation rather than a directive.
I welcome the fact that, in this instance,we are negotiating a regulation rather than a directive, as this ensures speedier implementation once it is approved.
The comment has already been made by Mrs Palacio and Mrs Mosiek-Urbahn that they would have preferred a recommendation rather than a directive.
This argues in favour of a Regulation rather than a Directive.
The new legal act takes the form of a Regulation rather than a Directive, since it is intended to be directly applicable in Member States without transposition into national law.
It appreciates the greater legal clarity that the form of a regulation rather than a directive brings.
The proposal is presented in the form of a regulation rather than a directive, since the new legislation is intended to be directly applicable without having to be transposed into national law.
As has already been said, we welcome the Commission's proposal, but call for an effective instrument, that is to say,a regulation rather than a directive.
The Committee advocates a Regulation as the appropriate form of legislation rather than a Directive, so as to ensure uniform time frames and control systems across all Member States.
Calls on the Commission to speed up the process of the new legislation on electronic signatures andwonders whether it would not be appropriate to adopt a regulation rather than a directive;
And I am satisfied in this context that we do need a regulation- rather than a directive- but that the regulation proposed is the minimum required to achieve the desired objectives and does not go beyond that.
The Committee nevertheless feels that given the current omissions and the distortion of competition that such omissions produce,the appropriate legal instrument should be a regulation rather than a directive.
It should be added that the Commission has chosen to present its proposal in the form of a non-binding recommendation rather than a directive, arguing that presently there is a great disparity in the inspection systems in the Member States.
Balancing these three interests, which are not always compatible, will not be easy andthat is why, like the rapporteur, I support at this stage a recommendation in this area rather than a directive.
I would, nevertheless, like to speak briefly about the Council' s legal instruments.Why have a Framework Decision rather than a directive, when it is a question of amending several, very important points, several provisions of the penal code in each of the Member States?
They should be drafted in a less detailed manner in orderto leave Member States sufficient discretion in their implementation. Ifthe enacting terms are too detailed and do not leave such discretion, the appropriate instrument will be a regulation, rather than a directive.
It underlines that the system must be entirely compatible with the international emissions trading regime foreseen in the Kyoto Protocol andthat it should be based on a directly binding EC regulation(rather than a directive), setting out a common and harmonised regulatory framework.
The Commission proposes a directive rather than a regulation as this former instrument is better suited to harmonising existing legislations.
Any standard adopted should beconsidered as an ideal, a perfection to work towards, rather than as a directive which many Member States might for financial reasons find it difficult to fulfil.
UEAPME did not see any need fora review of the Directive at this stage, while CEEP referred to a need to clarify certain national implementing measures rather than the Directive itself.