Examples of using Authorisation of gmos in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
This already gives us a basis for the authorisation of GMOs.
There are more than ten requests for authorisation of GMOs for cultivation(or for their renewal), at different stages of the procedure.
The reality of decision-making for the authorisation of GMOs.
We know that a proper decision for or against the authorisation of GMOs has scarcely ever been taken by the Council or the Committee of Permanent Representatives.
In these Guidelines,a commitment was taken to review the legislation applicable to the authorisation of GMOs.
Clear rules are set out in the EU for the assessment and authorisation of GMOs and GM-food but responsibilities are shared between Member States and the Community.
It was also expected thatthose amendments would have a positive impact on the decision-making process for the authorisation of GMOs for cultivation.
It will establish a"one door one key" procedure for the authorisation of GMOs for food and feed, including the deliberate release into the environment.
It is also important to note that the approval process could be significantly shortenedif the Commission had greater support from Member States in the comitology process for the authorisation of GMOs.
I hope that the next newly elected Parliament will create a new regulation on the authorisation of GMOs, based on the spirit of subsidiarity and transparency.
According to the legal framework for the authorisation of GMOs, the level of protection of human/animal health and of the environment chosen in the EU cannot be revised by a Member State and this situation must not be altered.
This shows that it is high time for us to rethink the method of authorisation of GMOs in the European Union.
According to the legal framework for the authorisation of GMOs, the level of protection of human/animal health and of the environment chosen in the EU cannot be revised by a Member State and this situation must not be altered.
The use of genetic engineering in plants and in food and feed is a subject which divides opinion in the Member States andthis is reflected in the decision-making process leading to the authorisation of GMOs and GM food and feed.
The second proposalwill establish a"one door one key" procedure for the authorisation of GMOs for food and feed, including the deliberate release into the environment.
The authorisation of GMOs is based on prior rigorous initial scientific assessment, which guarantees that the authorised products pose no health risks and may circulate freely as long as consumers are fully informed through traceability and labelling in order to promote choice.
The role of the Member States is particularly important in the authorisation of GMOs for cultivation, where they carry out the initial risk assessment of environmental aspects.
Until recently, the Union legal framework did not allow Member States to oppose to the use of GMOs for cultivation and other uses and GM food and feed on their territory by other means than expressing anegative vote during the decision-making process leading to the authorisation of GMOs and GM food and feed or, once the authorisation is granted, by invoking safeguard clauses/emergency clauses.
It will thus not affect the procedural and substantial conditions of the authorisation of GMOs and GM food and feed under Regulation(EC) No 1829/2003, which will remain valid for the whole territory of the Union.
Both Directive 2001/18/EC and Regulation(EC) No 1829/2003 establish a centralised procedure at Union level wherebythe Commission is empowered to adopt implementing decisions granting or refusing application for the authorisation of GMOs and GM food and feed, based on an assessment of the potential risks that they could pose to human or animal health, or the environment.
The Regulation establishes a"one doorone key" procedure for the scientific assessment and authorisation of GMOs and GM food and feed resulting in a centralised, clear and transparent EU procedure where an operator is able to file a single application.
The authorisation procedures for GMOs are slightly different from the procedure under Directive 90/220/EEC, but the basic rule is similar:In general, the authorisation of GMOs is a one-step process if all Member States agree to the initial assessment of a Member State, and a two-step process if one or more Member States object.
The second proposal will establisha"one door one key" procedure for the authorisation of GMOs for food and feed, including the deliberate release into the environment.
What are the benefits and disadvantages of the Community's regulatory architecture for authorisation of GMOs and derived products, in particular the inter-play between‘horizontal' and sector based legislation?
It is therefore proposed to establish a"onedoor one key"-procedure for the scientific assessment and authorisation of GMOs and GM food and feed resulting in a centralised, clear and transparent Community procedure where an operator only has to file a single application.
In addition, until the second revision of Directive 90/220/EEC, labelling indicating the presence of GMOs was not mandatory,so that currently, four authorisations of GMOs for feed use do not require mandatory labelling while four require mandatory labelling.
A series of other authorisations of GMOs, including their use as feed, are pending.
A total of 18 authorisations of GMOs have been granted for the placing on the market in the EU, two of which cover use as food(one maize, one soya), and eight cover use in feedingstuffs one for soya, four for maize and three for rape.
The new provisions are primarily aimed at enabling Member States to decide whether or not they wish to permit the cultivation of GMO crops on their territory,without affecting the risk assessment provided in the system of Union authorisations of GMOs.
The acceptance of unauthorised GMOs and the establishment of a threshold'for adventitious GMOs which are not yet authorised in the European Union', and which have not yet undergone full scientific testing,have resulted in a flood of authorisations of GMOs in the USA and, in particular, in developing countries. On account of the testing capacity in these countries, this leads to an increased risk of damage to health and the environment.

