Examples of using Csfs in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Steps in the CSFs and KPIs.
The spider chart below illustrates how a company's own performance is assessed against a competitor based on CSFs.
Table 5: The 198993 and 199499 CSFs(Objective 1)- Some key outputs.
To supplement CSFs and to take into consideration those aspects which are insufficiently or imperfectly covered in the CSFs;
Even every single department has its own CSFs: supplying, sales, logistics, etc.
The nine Objective 3 CSFs or SPDs and the eight Objective 4 CSFs or SPDs were adopted by the end of 1994.
The extent to which these interventions have been adjusted varies between MemberStates and regions, as well as between CSFs and SPDs.
Under Objectives 1 and 6, all CSFs, SPDs and other forms of intervention were subject to a Mid-Term Review.
The character and underlying causes of Portugal's economic problems are well understood and are discussed in both thefirst and second CSFs.
CSFs are a number of factors that are deemed highly important for the company's competitiveness, such as price, quality, product attributes etc.
As a result, the Commission has taken steps to ensureoverall coordination during preparation of the Objective 1 CSFs for Spain, Ireland, Portugal and Greece.
The CSFs for Objectives 3 and 4, in which the EIB is not involved, were approved by the Commission on 20 December 1989 and published in OJ L-64 of 13 March 1990.
Thus at the end of 1994 unimplemented commitment appropriations for CSFs and SPDs represented only around 1.5% of the appropriations allocated, or ECU 312.7 million.
In the case of Objective 1, ECU 1 243 million was allocated for that purpose in 1994-99, of which the Structural Funds would contribute ECU 899 million,about 1% of all Community assistance in the CSFs and SPDs.
The Committee requests the Commission to ensure that the time schedule for future CSFs will not be so short and that the administrative procedures at the Community, national and regional levels will be better coordinated.
The main questions which this assessment sought to answer are: what share of the growth expected to takeplace in 1994-99 can be attributed to the CSFs in general and to the Community contributions in particular?
According to the risk analysis and evaluation,Critical Success Factors(CSFs) are generated as a guidance to help investors& stockholders identify emerging opportunities, manage and minimize the risks, develop appropriate business models, and make wise strategies and decisions.
The Committee suggests, however, that indications should be given on the degree ofdecentralisation which existed in each Member State in drawing up the CSFs and the Operational Programmes and in their subsequent implementation.
The national, regional and local authorities responsible for implementing CSFs, Community initiatives, operational programmes and other forms of assistance shall be responsible for publicity on the spot.
The CSFs mostly operated in the framework of national strategies where the structure and definition of priorities was dominated either by sectoral considerations, as with the CSFs for Ireland and Portugal, or by regional planning considerations, as with the CSFs for Spain, Greece and Italy.
Since the vast bulk of the plans for Objective 1reached the Commission before 31 December 1999, all the CSFs and SPDs could be adopted in 2000, apart from the French national programme for computers, which was adopted early in 2001.
There are Objective 2 CSFs or SPDs in the various Member States- except, it will be recalled, the three States(Greece, Portugal and Ireland) that are entirely covered by Objective 1 and for which the Objective 2 type measures are integrated into their Objective 1 CSFs or SPDs.
Summary of the Structural Funds Process Integrating Structural Funds and SEA How To Use theHandbook- Part 3 RDPs and the SEA process CSFs, SPDs and Environmental Assessment The OPs and the SEA Process Continuity in the SEA and Structural Funds Process Varying Levels of Interaction and Coordination at the OP Stage.
This second phase follows closely the priorities of the first period: the development priorities take account of the structural problems and the development potential ofthe regions and are essentially a continuation of the priorities identified in the 1989-90 CSFs.
For the period 1991-93 as a whole, the amount allotted to the CSFs for the improvement of processing and marketing conditions for fishery and aquaculture products, initially set at ECU 156.3 million in March 1991, was raised to ECU 207.5 million in the course of the period.
It was also consulted on various texts concerning the regulationand management of the Structural Funds(procedures for amending CSFs and programmes under Objectives 1 and 2, use of the ecu, irregularities and recovery of sums wrongly paid) and on the fifth Periodic Report on the Social and Economic Situation in Regions of the Community.
This priority is included in all the CSFs and considerable resources are devoted to it(almost 29% of the total funding in the CSFs as compared with almost 28% during the previous period) although the contribution from the ESF to the CSFs as a whole has fallen slightly, from 27.5% to 23.5.
The breakdown is the same as for the Community Support Frameworks, as the CSFs for each Objective are subdivided into a multiregional CSF which is the responsibility of the national authorities, and regional CSFs which are the responsibility of the autonomous communities.
Hence, the exante evaluations for the Objective 1 CSFs and SPDs have had a triple function: as a critical view of the experience of the previous programming period, as a strategic contribution in terms of preparation of the plan as a response to its socioeconomic context and as a justification of the priorities and targets selected, using quantified indicators.
Here, it suffices to note that the strategy in the various plans and CSFs was characterised by an emphasis on infrastructures in the first period, with the upgrading of basic infrastructure(roads in particular) being the main strategic priority, giving way to a greater attention to the productive environment in the second period.