Examples of using Holons in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Therefore this is better for smaller holons physis, bios.
Infinite dynamics between the holons and statics considering a holon alternate, so we make a duality experience of static and dynamic because of holon choice.
Therefore this is better for bigger holons psyche, pneuma.
While an immense variety of holons are produced at each level of existence, only a very small proportion of them continue to develop into higher levels of existence.
Molecule and a pure accumulation of several holons not automatically forms a higher Holon.
The first tenet states that“Realityas a whole is not composed of things or processes, but of holons.
Descriptions of how to create Holons also appear in the Archives.
Which effects has the statement of the uncertaintynow on the subdivided elements of a holarchy named holons and their understanding?
This arises in our minds because of the formation of holons due to their zero-sum(= 0) in terms of time and direction.
The low-voltage connection of the local network stations makes it possibleto allocate generators and loads to different holons as required.
Thereby especially the lower layers physis and bios as small holons can be supported by intensity and proximity.
There are other kinds of holons in the micro or biological pathway that are ignored by Jantsch and Wilber, and which also have no corresponding holon in the macro or stellar pathway.
It is only necessary to remember that these are not holons but artifacts.
The above explanation of dualities and thus the formation of at least two holons in addition to the previous topic of information exchange now also leads to the topic of interactions.
Andrew Smith has used some subtle argumentation to demonstrate thatthis rule undermines Wilber's entire attempt to rank holons when applied consistently.
But that"emergence" happens only in the case of individual holons, not artifacts, not heaps, not hybrids and not even social holons.
A larger issue regarding this tenet hinges on the relationship between the qualities this tenet describes- agency and communion-and the definition of individual and social holons.
Smith believes that a viable distinction can be made between individual and social holons and does so in his own“one-scale model.
Smith goes on to question the degree and quantity of relationality between many macro and micro entities stating that"it's misleading to suggest, for example, that superclusters, clusters,or galaxies are associated with particular subatomic holons.
KW: Well, any object can be LOOKED AT from four perspectives,but only sentient holons POSSESS four dimensions or can LOOK FROM four perspectives.
Holons are statically detectable classifications, each generated by a"zero sum"(almost unchanged) of time and destination direction of its internal parts and similar to the zero points of a wave, which erase there, because of the dynamic wave superposition.
What statements can be made by integral consideration of different disciplines about interaction between individual,below simplified two holons(with polarity and motion) at an integral view?
In a critique of Edwards's stronger distinction between individual and collective holons, Andrew Smith points out that it is now difficult to see how these supposedly integrated individual and collective holons are related.
On the other hand, a perspective that asserts that different persons are transcended and included by the group isimplying that all people are equally developed holons, they all belong to the same level.
Linguistic communication can be seen as a process through which individual holons share artifacts that enable the relational exchange and the arising of intersubjectivity.
The individual holons or checkers on level 1(the beige meme) depend for their existence on intricate networks of interrelationships with all the other beige checkers in their environment-depend, that is, on networks of their own social holons the co evolution of micro and macro.
His alternative dispenses with the Wilber/Kofman revisions and simply develops the model set out in SES by placing holons within their“parental holarchy” or evolutionary line to determine whether they are individual or collective holons.
For example, one can think of parts and wholes merely in terms of physical or relational inclusion,one can see individual holons as juniors of a social holon, subjects to its unlimited authority, or one can subtly fall into the reductionistic attitude of equating a holon with its exterior surfaces, denying its interior dimension.
A central concern of Wilber and Kofman is that Wilber's earlier formulation of the relationship between individual and social holons could be construed as justifying a totalitarian control of a social holon over the individual holons that constitute it.
Wilber sidesteps this critique and reduces it to the idea that poststructuralism essentially agrees with his holarchic view because“a close look at their work shows that it is driven precisely by a conception of holons within holons, of texts within texts within texts(or contexts within contexts within contexts), and it is the sliding play of texts within texts that forms the'foundationless' platform from which they launch their attacks.