Examples of using Present request in English and their translations into Greek
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Accordingly, the present request for an Opinion is admissible.
In any event, since the dispute in the mainproceedings has been resolved, the Court should dismiss the present request for a preliminary ruling as inadmissible.
The present request for a preliminary ruling was made on 4 September 2019.
That Protocol is not relevant to determining the present request for a preliminary ruling.
The present request accordingly concerns the interpretation of Article 20(2) of Directive 2008/9.
The Romanian Government contends that the present request for a preliminary ruling is not admissible.
Their present request reveals that they have not applied the counsel Jesus has given on this matter.
This case-law is not called into question by the present request for a preliminary ruling or by the parties to the proceedings.
The present request for a preliminary ruling concerns only the custodial sentence relating to offences 3 to 5.
However, the public prosecutor at the Court of Appeal considered that, andI quote,"contrary to the view expressed by the other prosecutor, the present request for waiver of immunity gives grounds for reservations".
Smilde submits that the present request for a preliminary ruling is inadmissible.
In the present case, it is apparent, however,that the question whether Directive 2013/11 is applicable to the dispute in the main proceedings is inextricably linked to the answers to be given to the present request for a preliminary ruling.
Accordingly, the present request for an Opinion is admissible.
The present request for waiver of immunity, therefore, does not concern the issue whether these prosecutions may or should continue in accordance with French law.
Decisions are made by vote, which is by show of hands, unless one fourth(1/4)of the members present request a vote by roll call or by ballot, whereupon the Meeting votes according to the request. .
As regards the present request, it is worthy of note that the proposal to create a unified judicial system in the field of patents was being studied by the Council when the request was submitted to the Court.
The present request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État(Council of State, France) follows on from the judgment in Google Spain and Google(2) and will provide the Court, in particular, with the opportunity to clarify the territorial scope of Directive 95/46/EC.
The Italian Government submits that the present request for a preliminary ruling may not be examined by the Court of Justice, since the referring court does not accept the binding and definitive interpretative value that the answer given by the Court in response to that request has.
The present request for a preliminary ruling arises in the context of a dispute concerning the scope of the right to deduct input VAT incurred on goods and services used indissociably by taxable persons for the purposes of both their economic and non-economic activities.
The present request for a preliminary ruling essentially concerns the interpretation of Article 23 of Regulation No 44/2001 in the specific context of actions for damages brought by a distributor against its supplier on the basis of Article 102 TFEU, namely where the supplier is alleged to have abused its dominant position.
The present request for a preliminary ruling, which invites the Court to‘reconsider' the legality, under the competition rules, of selective distribution systems in the light of recent developments in the e-commerce sector, the possible economic consequences of which should not be underestimated,(4) constitutes a perfect illustration of that point.
It must be borne in mind that the present request for a preliminary ruling appears to have been cast by the BVerfG in terms which permit the Court of Justice to expect, within the limits of what is reasonable, that the BVerfG will accept as sufficient and final the answer it receives and as providing it with sufficient criteria to enable it to decide on the claims raised in the main proceedings.