Examples of using Nuclearization in English and their translations into Hebrew
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
I would begin the nuclearization of South Korea and Japan.
Our assessment is bolstered by ourobservations of some activity that is inconsistent with full nuclearization.".
Iranian nuclearization will bring in its wake nuclear chaos.
Trump wanted to discuss provisions that would prevent the nuclearization of Iran after that term.
The best way to prevent the nuclearization of the Middle East is to either fully fix the Iran deal or full nix it.
Europe admitted the agreement had some flaws,but claimed it was the best pact for preventing the nuclearization of Iran.
We also survived the nuclearization of Pakistan and North Korea.
US and UN sanctions against North Korea- which were initiated in 1950-failed to prevent the Nuclearization of Pyongyang.
Israel can delay Iran's nuclearization, but it cannot prevent it.
Iran's nuclearization will inevitably create a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, which will further increase the threat to Israel.
Seventy-seven percent of the Jews think the sanctions the Western states are imposing onIran will not help prevent its nuclearization.
Therefore, the way to prevent this danger, the nuclearization of the Middle East, is to either thoroughly correct the agreement or abrogate it.”.
In addition to these two doctrines, Israel has a third, very specific approach to coping with an enemystate that is suspected of trying to achieve nuclearization.
He clarified Israel's commitment to prevent this nuclearization and reiterated his opinion that it is necessary to deal with the flaws in the agreement.
Hundreds of millions of people saw it and understand now what they perhaps did not understand beforehand- what it means to stop Iran,at what phase and what stage of its nuclearization.
But it must be understood that thereal story is the contest between Iran's nuclearization and the fall of the current regime of the ayatollahs in Iran.
An overwhelming majority of Israelis believe that the Iranian nuclear threat constitutes an existential threat to the State of Israel andthat the only way to stop Iran's nuclearization is by a military attack.
Public opinion in all these countries, of course, understandably opposes nuclearization, but public opinion is fickle when North Korea sends missiles into one's air space.
Hundreds of millions of people saw the diagram and now they understand what they might not have previously comprehended, namely,what it means to stop Iran and at what stage on its march towards nuclearization this must be done.”.
The cautious president sees not the catastrophicprice the West will pay for Iran's nuclearization, but the political price he will pay if oil prices rise.”.
In relation to Iran, despite failed US diplomacy, he not only omitted any reference to red lines but even failed to state- as he had in the past-that all options were open if the Iranians continued their drive towards nuclearization.
He noted that the sanctions were having noimpact on progress in“the irreversible path of the nuclearization of the Iranian nation”(3) and denied Western reports of a slowdown in Iran's nuclear enrichment.
However, beginning in mid-August 2009, Saudi papers have published articles harshly critical of Iran, some of them in response to Iranian accusations regarding a Saudi connection to terrorism and to Yemen,and others warning against Iran's nuclearization and against its"interference" in Middle East affairs.
The balancing formula in light of the Iranian achievement(and Assad's murderous behavior)must include a maximum reduction in the danger of Iranian nuclearization, along with containment of Iran's potential for conventional aggression.
The public's cautious attitude toward the Iranian issue emerges on the question of whether Israel should attack Iran by itself to stop it from producing nuclear weapons, in the event that economic sanctions imposed by Western countries fail andthose countries opt not to use force to prevent Iranian nuclearization.
Many countries in the Middle East are saying that they are also allowed to enrich uranium if Iran is allowed to do so; therefore,the way to prevent this danger, the nuclearization of the Middle East, is to either thoroughly correct the agreement or abrogate it.
Would Israel leverage such attitude by the American public and its representatives in both chambers of Congress, their traditional solid support of the Jewish state and the power of Congress to initiate and stop the supply of sophisticated military systems,in order to enhance Israeli capabilities to prevent the nuclearization of Iran?