Examples of using Use of physical force in English and their translations into Hebrew
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The use of physical force is required?
Man's rights can be violated only by the use of physical force.
Use of physical force, threat or intimidation.
Basically, there is only one way to do it: by the use of physical force.
The use of physical force-- even its retaliatory use-- cannot be left at the discretion of individual citizens.
You know what our policy is regarding the use of physical force on students.
En private action and governmental action- a difference thoroughly ignored and evaded today-lies in the fact that a government holds a monopoly on the legal use of physical force.
Such an instrument of warfare dispensed with any use of physical force and could achieve incomparably greater effects that the best army.
We need to make an effort toteach people how to resolve conflict without the use of physical force.
A government is the means of placing the retaliatory use of physical force under objective control-i.e., under objectively defined laws.
Images can make people subservient anddisconnected from their true needs, without the use of physical force or violence.
Westerners in Europe have delegated the“legitimate use of physical force”- commonly, if controversially, known as the“monopoly on violence”- to the State.
They have argued that it is right for the state to take preemptive military actionwhen the evidence suggests a genuine risk that another state will initiate coercive use of physical force.
Such a government does not have the right to initiate the use of physical force against anyone- a right which the individual does not possess and, therefore, cannot delegate to any agency.
HUMAN RIGHTS: Potentially, a government is the most dangerous threat toman's rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims.
Forcible transfer does not necessarily require the use of physical force by authorities, but may be triggered by specific circumstances that leave individuals or communities with no choice but to leave;
To be put into practice, this belief has to be implemented by the political doctrine that the government- the state-has the right to initiate the use of physical force against its citizens.
No individual or private group orprivate organization has the legal power to initiate the use of physical force against other individuals or groups and to compel them to act against their own voluntary choice.
The difference between political power and any other kind of social"power," between a government and any private organization,is the fact that a government holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force.
The prohibition on forcible transfer applies not only to the use of physical force, but also to compelling people to leave their homes against their will, or as a result of pressure exerted upon them or upon their families.
Max Weber, in his 1919 essay,"Politics as a Vocation", claims that the State isany"human community that claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.".
The proper purpose of governmentis to protect individual rights by banning the use of physical force from social relationships and by using force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use. .
The Association for Civil Rights in Israel said that the statements made by the lawyers raised serious doubtregarding the use of illegal interrogation methods, such as the use of physical force and the deprivation of sleep for long periods.
Capitalism is the social system in whichgovernment protects individual rights by banning the use of physical force from social relationships, and by using force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use. .
Do Not Use Physical Force.
Is it necessary to use physical force?
He didn't use physical force at all.