Examples of using Evaluation questions in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Common evaluation questions for rural development.
Future evaluations should cover fewer evaluation questions.
Evaluation questions related to Union level objectives.
A CMEF guidance document59 sets out five evaluation questions related to water.
(c) common evaluation questions, as set out in Annex V;
Based on the purpose of the evaluation and the programme objectives, eight evaluation questions were formulated.
Consider your evaluation questions and research topics!
The Commission agrees with the view of the Court thatfuture evaluations should cover fewer evaluation questions.
Evaluation questions related to other aspects of the RDP.
The working paper set out the evaluation questions and the content of an evaluation report(See box 3).
A major issue that needs to be explored is whether to focus on a small number of relevant evaluation questions.
The scope of the evaluation and the evaluation questions will be formulated during the preparation of the tender specifications.
Reporting and quantification of programme achievements, inparticular through assessment of the complementary result indicators, and relevant evaluation questions.
Definitions of the indicators, common evaluation questions and methodological guidance are given in a non-binding‘CMEF handbook' issued by the Commission4.
The Commission shall ensure a midterm and final evaluation of the Programme,focusing on pertinent evaluation questions and in time to be integrated into the decision making process.
Include any psychological evaluation questions in this section that, as a manager, give you a better idea of how this candidate thinks, works in a team environment, and responds to stress.
The evaluator then carried out an in-depth analysis of these data in order toanswer the evaluation questions, following a triangulation process which involved cross-referencing all the data collected.
Recommendation 3: The Commission should work with the Member States to ensure that the enhanced annual implementation reporting of 2019 provides clear and comprehensive information on programme achievements andthat the required answers to common evaluation questions provide an improved basis for the next programming period.
Mid-term evaluation shall deal with the evaluation questions and shall examine in particular the initial achievements, their relevance to and consistency with the rural development programming document and the extent to which the targets have been attained.
The ongoing first assessment of Annual Implementation Reports 2017, started in July,shows that result indicators have been quantified and common evaluation questions answered, taking into account the level of uptake of the Rural Development Programmes.
An ex-post evaluation discussing the key evaluation questions of technical measures should be carried out before 2022 when the landing obligation should be fully operational, MSY achieved for all stocks and good environmental status achieved for marine ecosystems.
Reports shall include a description of the context and contents of the programme, financial information and the answers- including the indicators used-to the common evaluation questions and the evaluation questions defined at national or regional level, as well as conclusions and recommendations.
Ex post evaluation shall answer the evaluation questions, paying particular attention to the use made of resources and the effectiveness and efficiency of assistance and its impact and shall draw conclusions concerning rural development policy, including its contribution to the common agricultural policy.
The review of 23 mid-term evaluation(MTE) reports conducted as part of thisaudit revealed that the information needed to answer the evaluation questions is, in most cases, lacking and the assessment of project effectiveness is mainly based on theoretical arguments rather than on evidence from completed projects.
The Commission shares the CourtŐs opinion that terms of reference play an important role in achieving good quality evaluations results.(c) Given budget and time constraints, future ex post evaluations will be more focused on key evaluation questions and will be prepared and launched earlier than the 1994 to 1999 exercise.
The cMEf is inadequate to appraise the impact of the financialsupport under measure 122 because the performance indicators and evaluation questions included in the cMEf do not allow determining whether the funded investments resulted in an improvement of the economic value of the forests where they were carried out(paragraphs 42 to 46).
Also in Canada(2) evaluation panels are permanent in order to guarantee a consistent and coherent approach(see Annex III),- when definingthe terms of reference for panels, and specifying the evaluation questions, the Commission does not consult with external stakeholders, such as industry and major research organisations participating in the FPs.
Special Report No 5/2010- Implementation of the Leader approach for ruraldevelopment 71 There are specific CMEF evaluation questions for Leader on the improvement of governance, the mobilisation of endogenous development potential, multisectoral approaches and cooperation, and the contribution to the priorities of other axes.
Xi. in terms of monitoring, the cMEf is inadequate to appraise the impact of the financialsupport under measure 122 because the performance indicators and evaluation questions included in the cMEf do not allow a determination of whether the funded investments resulted in an improvement of the economic value of the forests where they were carried out.
It provides details of suggested methods anddata sources for assessing each of the indicators related to the evaluation questions and these do not rely on CMEF monitoring data, but use other evaluative methods, e.g. triangulation, surveys, case studies, focus groups, multiplier analysis, derived data sets, etc. This guidance document will give the opportunity for adjustments in the monitoring and evaluation process.