Examples of using Lethal autonomous in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Lethal autonomous weapons.
One is that we should avoid an arms race and lethal autonomous weapons.
Lethal autonomous weapons.
Reiterates its position on lethal autonomous weapon systems(LAWS);
Lethal autonomous weapons are mostly based on Artificial Intelligence.
Does not follow the EP resolution to ban lethal autonomous weapons.
Or maybe lethal autonomous drones, massed-produced, mosquito-sized killer bot swarms.
Has the company committed to not contribute to the development of lethal autonomous weapons?
Russell added:“Pursuing the development of lethal autonomous weapons would drastically reduce international, national, local, and personal security.”.
Having regard to the call by the Holy See for a ban on lethal autonomous weapons.
Whereas lethal autonomous weapon systems have the potential to fundamentally change warfare by prompting an unprecedented and uncontrolled arms race;
The U.S., Russia, China,Israel and others are already developing lethal autonomous weaponry.
Whereas any given lethal autonomous weapon system could malfunction on account of badly written code or a cyber-attack perpetrated by an enemy state or a non-state actor;
Whereas non-autonomous systems such as automated, remotely operated andtele-operated systems should not be considered as lethal autonomous weapons systems;
Whereas the term‘lethal autonomous weapon systems' refers to weapon systems without meaningful human control over the critical functions of selecting and attacking individual targets;
Many of the world's leading AI researchers andhumanitarian organizations are concerned about the potentially catastrophic consequences of allowing lethal autonomous weapons to be developed.
Whereas the use of lethal autonomous weapon systems raises fundamental ethical and legal questions of human control, in particular with regard to critical functions such as target selection and engagement;
Whereas non-autonomous systems such as automated, remotely operated andtele-operated systems should not be considered as lethal autonomous weapons systems;
Stresses, in this light,the fundamental importance of preventing the development and production of any lethal autonomous weapon system lacking human control in critical functions such as target selection and engagement;
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 31May 2017 calling for a human-in-command approach to artificial intelligence and a ban on lethal autonomous weapon systems.
Whereas the use of lethal autonomous weapon systems raises key questions about the implementation of international human rights law, international humanitarian law and European norms and values with regard to future military actions;
Urges the VP/HR, the Member States and the Council to work towards the start of international negotiations on a legally binding instrument prohibiting lethal autonomous weapon systems;
A group of the world's leading AI researchers andhumanitarian organizations warned about lethal autonomous weapons systems, or killer robots, that select and kill targets without human control.
Whereas this letter also stated that‘lethal autonomous weapons threaten to become the third revolution in warfare' which‘will permit armed conflict to be fought at a scale greater than ever, and at timescales faster than humans can comprehend';
Whereas an unknown number of countries, publiclyfunded industries and private industries are reportedly researching and developing lethal autonomous weapon systems, ranging all the way from missiles capable of selective targeting to learning machines with cognitive skills to decide whom, when and where to fight;
Whereas Parliament has repeatedly called for the urgent development and adoption of a common position on lethal autonomous weapon systems, for an international ban on the development,production and use of lethal autonomous weapon systems enabling strikes to be carried out without meaningful human control, and for a start to effective negotiations for their prohibition;
Whereas an unknown numberof countries, publicly funded industries and private industries are reportedly researching and developing lethal autonomous weapon systems, ranging all the way from missiles capable of selective targeting to learning machines with cognitive skills to decide whom, when and where to fight;
Whereas Parliament has repeatedly called for the urgent development and adoption of a common position on lethal autonomous weapon systems, for an international ban on the development, production and use of lethal autonomous weapon systems enabling strikes to be carried out without meaningful human control, and for a start to effective negotiations for their prohibition;
In particular, the programme shall not fund incendiary weapons including white phosphorus,depleted uranium ammunitions, lethal autonomous weapons without meaningful human control over the critical functions of selecting and attacking individual targets, small arms and light weapons mainly developed for export purposes, i.e. where no Member State has expressed a requirement for the action to be carried out.