Examples of using Agusta in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
MV AGUSTA F3 675. Technical data of motorcycle.
Agostini sensationally switched from MV Agusta to Yamaha.
MV AGUSTA F4 SPR. Technical data of motorcycle.
Likewise, the Commission noted that the Corpo Forestale's helicopter fleet is essentially composed of Agusta or Agusta Bell helicopters.
MV AGUSTA 350 Scrambler. Technical data of motorcycle.
The Commission noted that the Corpo Nazionale dei Vigili del Fuoco's helicopter fleet is essentially composed of Agusta or Agusta Bell helicopters.
The helicopter was an Agusta A109S, operated by the company Babcock.
Agusta-Bell AB 412 Civil utility transport version,built under license in Italy by Agusta.
Its aim was to develop the Bell/Agusta AB139 helicopter and the Bell/Agusta BA609 tiltrotor aircraft.
Agusta-Bell AB 212ASW Anti-submarine warfare, anti-shipping version of the AB 212 helicopter,built under license in Italy by Agusta.
And to cap it all, brand royalty-- Agusta, Count Agusta, from the great histories of this stuff.
MV Agusta, originally Meccanica Verghera Agusta, is a motorcycle manufacturer founded on 12 February 1945 near Milan in Cascina Costa, Italy.
As regards the period prior to the year 2000,the Italian authorities admitted having purchased Agusta and Agusta Bell helicopters without any competitive tendering procedure.
In 1998 Agusta formed a joint venture with Bell Helicopter Textron called the Bell/Agusta Aerospace Company.
As to the Corpo Forestale dello Stato(Ministry of Agricultural and Forestry Policy), apart from the purchases which formed the subjectmatter of Case C-525/03,that body is said to have purchased one other Agusta helicopter.
Italy submits that the relations with Agusta were‘in-house' relations and in its defence it traces the development of public participation in Agusta.
The Danish Parliament decided to contribute a C-130 transport plane andthe Belgian government made the decision to send two C-130s along with one Medical Component Agusta A109 Medevac medical evacuation helicopter along with 80 support personnel to Mali.
The exception was MV Agusta, which became the pre-eminent name in Motorcycle racing winning 139 grand prix races in the 500cc class from 1952 to 1976.
It suffices to state that Italy failed to explain andto prove to a sufficient extent what led it to consider that only Agusta helicopters had the required characteristics to justify the purchases under Article 6(3)(c) and(e) of the Directive.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations- Public supplycontracts- Directives 77/62/EEC and 93/36/EEC- Award of public contracts without prior publication of a notice- Absence of competitive tendering- Agusta and Agusta Bell helicopters.
Secondly, that Member State relies on the confidential nature of the information which is obtained to put the helicopters manufactured by Agusta into production to justify the award of the contracts to that company following the negotiated procedure.
Thus, since Agusta is a company in part open to private capital and therefore meets the criterion stated in paragraph 38 of the present judgment, the Italian State cannot exercise over that company a control similar to that which it exercises over its own departments.
Romano Fenati, who was on the provisional entry list,withdrew from the 2019 season after his contract with MV Agusta Reparto Corse Forward Racing Team was terminated due to the controversial incident at the 2018 San Marino Grand Prix.
Case C-337/05: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations- Public supplycontracts- Directives 77/62/EEC and 93/36/EEC- Award of public contracts without prior publication of a notice- Absence of competitive tendering- Agusta and Agusta Bell helicopters.
In such circumstances, andwithout the necessity of examining whether Agusta carries out the essential part of its activities with the concession-granting public authority, the Italian Republic's argument that there is an‘in-house' relationship between that company and the Italian State must be rejected.
It was formed in July 2000 as an Anglo-Italian multinational company,when Finmeccanica and GKN merged their respective helicopter subsidiaries(Agusta and Westland Helicopters) to form AgustaWestland, with each holding a 50% share.
In this case, the Italian Republic contends that the purchases of Agusta and Agusta Bell helicopters meet the legitimate requirements of national interest foreseen in Articles 296 EC and 2(1)(b) of Directive 93/36, on the ground that those helicopters are dual-use items, that is to say, they may serve as well for civilian as for military purposes.
Her liking for defence ties with the United States was demonstrated in the Westland affair when she acted with colleagues to prevent the helicopter manufacturer Westland, a vital defence contractor,from linking with a European Consortium including the Italian firm Agusta in favour of a link with Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation of the United States.
However, the Italian Republic has not stated the reasons for which it submits that the confidentiality of the information communicated for the production of the helicopters manufactured by Agusta would be less well guaranteed were such production entrusted to other companies, be they established in Italy or in other Member States.
On the basis of the information received within the framework of the above procedure, the Commission noted that the specific infringement, forming the subjectmatter of that procedure was not an isolated incident butwas symptomatic of a general practice of directly awarding contracts for the purchase of helicopters manufactured by Agusta and Agusta Bell to meet the requirements of various corps of the Italian State, without any tendering procedure.