Examples of using Cross-border service in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
- 
                        Official
                    
 - 
                        Official/political
                    
 - 
                        Colloquial
                    
 - 
                        Medicine
                    
 - 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
 - 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
 - 
                        Financial
                    
 - 
                        Programming
                    
 - 
                        Computer
                    
 
Cross-border services may be provided by.
Obligations of cross-border service providers vote.
Cross-border services are increasingly provided on line.
The opportunity to provide cross-border services in every EU country.
The cross-border service of judicial and extrajudicial documents;
A 15% increase in the volume of intra-regional trade and cross-border services by 2020.
Obligations of cross-border service providers debate.
This amendment emphasises an important aspect of the Body's work in regard to cross-border services.
Cross-border services are important to the development of the internal market.
You submit the declaration again each year in which you intend to provide cross-border service.
More cross-border services will foster a wider range of customer offers.
Harmonisation of quality standards will strengthen consumer and supplier confidence in cross-border services.
His case proves that cross-border services are already functioning without this directive.
Now, the consumer acquis already sets out a number of obligations for cross-border service providers.
Our clients need integrated, cross-border service and the same high quality wherever they do business around the world.
It is introducing regulations which lead to competitive exclusion of legitimate cross-border service providers.
A legislative initiative will therefore be proposed for cross-border service providers, in particular for the construction and business services  sectors.
The proposed directive should not undermine competitiveness orcreate new obstacles for cross-border service providers.
Paradoxically, however, the consistent application of the Services  Directive andthe removal of barriers to cross-border service provision might work as a catalyst for the economic growth of the entire EU, enabling the crisis to be overcome more rapidly.
Although it would be useful or even necessary, there is a lack of consistency here in the simplification of cross-border service provision.
Member of the Commission.- Mr President,I have been listening very carefully to the discussion on Parliament's report on the obligations of cross-border service providers.
The concept of provider is thus not limited solely to cross-border service provision within the framework of the free movement of services  but also covers cases in which an operator establishes itself in a Member State in order to develop its service  activities there.
On services  more generally, access to reliable information on applicable requirements is often a barrier,notably for cross-border service providers.
With regard to cross-border service provision, the proposal for the revised Directive provides that Member States will have to clearly identify and justify those cases where they want to make use of the exceptional possibility to check the qualification of service  providers before they can offer services. .
The next item is the report by Lasse Lehtinen, on behalf of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, on the obligations of cross-border service providers.
Action is also needed at EU level to reduce fragmentation of end-user protection rules,which raises administrative costs for cross-border service providers and hinders development of innovative services,  while resulting in an uneven and sub-optimal level of consumer protection across the Union.
Whereas a committee should be established to assist the Commission with the implementation of this Directive,particularly in relation to the future work on the development of measures relating to the quality of Community cross-border service and technical standardisation;
I have also to underline that the Commission takes a different view to Mr Lehtinen's report on the need for a separate horizontal instrument to cover obligations of cross-border service providers at this stage for the simple reason that we believe that we should first accomplish our ongoing initiatives before coming, if necessary, to a separate horizontal instrument.
I know there have been some interesting discussions on developments and the current state of play, and future challenges for the relations between Switzerland and the EU, with special emphasis on the EU-Swiss dialogue on tax issues, free movement of persons andthe experiences from the latest EU enlargements, cross-border service provision and the Schengen-Dublin agreements, Swiss financial contributions to the EU enlargement, and free trade in agricultural products.