Examples of using Average effect in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
In the short term, the average effect of the real exchange rate is 0.233 in relative prices.
More specifically, it aims to overcome the limitation in Brazilian empirical studies that tend to focus on the average effect of IFRS adoption.
Beyond these average effects, Doleac and Stein estimated the heterogeneity of effects. .
It also does not allow to check for variations in average effect as a function of previous score.
The average effect of a radiation dose given quickly and exposing the whole body is summarized below.
The first deals with motherhood with its average effects for brazil, placing brazil in the motherhood pay gap literature.
The average effect obtained by interventions aiming at increasing adults' fruit and vegetable consumption is around half a serving more per day 18.
Experiments normally measure the average effect, but the effect can be different for different people.
In addition, the coat of all Fildena® dosages is made of a special substance that accelerates thedigestibility of the tablet, giving an average effect of 5% faster.
Through the average effect of treatment groups can be identified if the quota policy had the expected result and students enter and complete the courses with different knowledge level.
When the values were statistically heterogeneous, the estimates of average effects difference between the weighted averages were obtained using a random-effects model I;>50.
Thus, this paper aims to overcome the limitation found in the Brazilian literature from treating the companiesin a homogenous way, the results for which generally capture the average effect for companies around IFRS adoption.
In the AMMI1 analysis,the abscissa represents the average effect of genotype and environment while the ordinate infers the stability IPCA1 scores Figure 3c.
To do this, data from the census(2010) and two methodologies were used: propensity score matching(psm) and quantilico effect treatment firpo(2007),which check the average effect and distribution, respectively.
When the values were statistically homogeneous, the average effects difference between the weighted averages were calculated using a fixed-effect model I;
The simplest type of ab initio electronic structure calculation is the Hartree-Fock method(HF), an extension of molecular orbital theory, in which the correlated electron-electron repulsion is not specifically taken into account;only its average effect is included in the calculation.
The estimation of experimental groups average effects are almost all negative, although many of them do not allow to confidently infer effect direction.
When the results obtained with competing risks are used,there is also a risk of heterogeneous or spurious average effects for example, when bleeding and thrombotic events are combined.
Here, a dummy point in time for T1 captures the longitudinal effect, post-intervention, on the factors that are equally related to y in each group; the dummy indicates the experimental group that reveals differences between the two before the intervention; the difference-in-differences estimator is the effect, which expresses the impact of the project on the variable of interest, y, expressing the average effect on the experimental side.
In addition, it is applied klein-vella method as a corrective procedure to obtain the true average effect, not only an effect for individuals who are truly affected by changes in the instruments.
As specific objectives, we sought to: 1 verify,via meta-analysis, the average effect size of studies using transcranial direct-current stimulation(tdcs) and their effect on behavior; 2 verify whether neuromodulatory effects via non-invasive transcranial stimulation alter scores on implicit measures of human values; 3 check whether the neuromodulation produces behavioral changes; and 4 verify if the scores on implicit measures of human values, after stimulation, correlate with the behavioral variables.
Quantal analysis refers to the methods used to deduce, for a particular synapse,how many quanta of transmitter are released and what the average effect of each quantum is on the target cell, measured in terms of amount of ions flowing(charge) or change in the membrane potential.
The empirical estimation strategy was based on three steps:i estimating the average effect of conventional treatment by different methods, following heckman and honore(1990) and heckman and vytlacil(1999), ii the bounds of variation of shaikh and vytlacil(2004) for the impact of treatment and iii a test of robustness for estimating instrumental variable that includes the unemployment rate as a way to endogenize the years of schooling of individuals.
A large effect size was identified for the domains Physical functioning r 0.55, Role physical r 0.60, Bodily pain r 0.59 andRole emotional r 0.79 and average effect for general health status r 0.32, Vitality r 0.24, Social functioning r 0.28 and Mental health r 0.21 Table 2.
Study methods varied widely; therefore,we estimated the average effect across studies and performed sensitivity analysis, where appropriate, by excluding outliers and studies at high risk of bias.
After estimating the propensity score PS, subgroups are obtained within the control group with similar probabilities to those individuals in the treatment group; and after carrying out the necessary tests, define a number of strata,being able to subsequently calculate the Average Effect with Stratified Pairing, which is one of the existing methods in the literature.
The estimate of this variation is given by the equation Tj+ ßT x,that is, the average effect of the treatment j(T j) added to the slope given by the interaction of the treatment variable with the pre-test measure(βT) as a function of the pretest score x.
In turn, considering the operational complexity dimension, the coefficient of correlation between operational complexity andthe CGI is 0.334, which represents an average effect, suggesting a positive and significant correlation with an average effect between operational complexity and the CGI.
Panel error correction models were estimated using differents estimation techniques, the average effect of the real exchange rate in the long run is 0.673, i.e. an increase of 1% in the real exchange rate leads to an increase of 0.07% in relative prices.
The effect of all the other individuals on any given individual is approximated by a single averaged effect, thus reducing a many-body problem to a one-body problem.