Examples of using Note dated in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
A note dated 31 May 1454 in a manuscript of Procopius Cod.
This decision was criticized by the CPT in a note dated June 10th.
In a note dated July 16, the Commission granted the State an additional period of 30 days.
The Commission transmitted the pertinent parts of the petition andthe additional evidence to the State by note dated May 11, 2001.
By a note dated February 14, 2000, the State requested an extension to submit its response.
Following receipt of Mr. Roach's petition,the Commission transmitted the pertinent parts of the petition to the State by note dated December 1, 2000.
A note dated 8 November 1847 in the military archives pension records indicates Rosas had died.
In the absence of a timely response from the State,the Commission reiterated its request for precautionary measures in a note dated November 18, 2002.
In an administrative note dated 29 July 2002 the Commission reports that since 1998 there have been 49- not 50- disciplinary cases.
The Government's decision to accept the in loco visit of the Commission was later confirmed by diplomatic note dated February 19, 1997.
The State responded by note dated September 8, 1998, in which it provided additional information on the admissibility of Mr. Martinez Villareal's petition.
Following receipt of Mr. Ram Loganís petition,the Commission transmitted the pertinent parts of the petition to the State by note dated January 22, 2001.
The State filed its response to the petition via a note dated December 14, 1995, expressly indicating its disposition to seek a friendly settlement of the matter at issue.
Following receipt of Mr. Mohammedís petition,the Commission transmitted the pertinent parts of the petition to the State by note dated December 18, 2001.
In a note dated December 15, 2000 and received by the Commission on December 19, 2000, the State provided a response to the Petitioners' observations of November 9, 2000.
The pertinent parts of the State's response were transmitted to the Petitioners by note dated January 7, 1998 with observations requested within 30 days.
In a handwritten note dated 11 March 1972, Stumpe presented his proposed solution- a capacitive touch screen with a fixed number of programmable buttons presented on a display.
Similarly, following receipt of Mr. Ramnarace's petition,the Commission transmitted the pertinent parts of his petition to the State by note dated April 19, 2001, with a request for information on the petition within 90 days.
However, on January 13, 1997,the Commission received a note dated January 13, 1996, which informed the Commission that inter alia,"Having examined the Petitioner's response, the Ministry has decided not to make a reply at this time.
Following the receipt of the Petitioners' complaint,the Commission transmitted the pertinent parts of the complaint to the United States by means of a note dated August 27, 1998 with a request for observations within 60 days as established by the Commission's Rules of Procedure.
By note dated March 10, 2003, the Commission transmitted Report N° 26/03 to the State, and requested that the Government of the United States inform the Commission within two months as to the measures adopted to comply with the recommendations made to resolve the situation denounced.
The Director General of OLAF acknowledged receipt of this information by note dated 11 December 2000, and requested the complainant to supply all available information regarding the alleged irregularities.
By note dated June 18, 2001, the Commission informed the Petitioners that, in light of the State's position on the Commission's offer, it was apparent that a friendly settlement of the matter was not possible and therefore that the Commission would continue to process the matter in accordance with the provisions of the American Convention and the Commission's Rules of Procedure.
In their observations, the complainants pointed out that in so far as the supplementaryinsurance policy for temporary incapacity to work was concerned,the Commission had, in a note dated 8 June 2000,asked its representation in Vienna to confirm that the localstaff approved the supplementary insurance offered by the Merkur company.
In light of this decision, in a note dated June 22, 2000 the Commission again reiterated its request that the State take whatever measures were deemed necessary to ensure that Mr. Sankofa's execution was stayed pending the Commission's investigation of the matter and asked for an urgent response to its request.
Following the receipt of the Petitioners' petition, which was designated as Petition P4446/02,the Commission transmitted the pertinent parts of the complaint to the United States by means of a note dated November 8, 2002 with a request for observations within two months as established by the Commission's Rules of Procedure.
Also by note dated May 20, 1997 the Commission informed the Petitioners that a case had been opened in respect of their petition, that the State had been advised of the situation set forth in their communication, and that the Commission had requested that the State stay Mr. Martinez Villareal's execution until it had the opportunity to investigate the allegations in the petition, or alternatively that the State commute his death sentence.
Upon receipt of the Petitioners' petition,the Commission, by note dated May 19, 1997 advised the State that the Commission had been informed of Mr. Martinez Villareal's May 21, 1997 execution date, and requested that the State stay the execution for humanitarian reasons until the Commission had an opportunity to investigate the matter, or alternatively to commute Mr. Martinez Villareal's death sentence to one of life imprisonment.
In a note dated September 26, 2002, the Commission informed the United States that the information provided by the State failed to provide the Commission with any other insights into the specific threats of irreparable harm potentially faced by the class of INS detainee represented by the Petitioners, in particular information relating to the identities, location or status of the detainees concerned, the legal basis for their confinement, or the conditions under which they were being detained.
Show and edit note dates directly from the note editor.