Examples of using Position vector in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
It's a position vector.
So hopefully you have a gut feeling now of what the derivative of these position vectors really are.
And are the position vectors of their respective masses.
So a good place to start is the derivative of our position vector function with respect to t.
So then our position vector, r, would point to this point.
So if you actually substitute t is equal to a here,you would get a position vector that would point to that point over there.
And when you say it's a position vector, you're implicitly saying this is specifying a unique position. .
Where: a indicates the radius of the spherical lesion,and?is the angle between the position vector r and the main magnetic field axis z axis.
And our second position vector valued function, r2 of t, is going to be equal to 2t times i plus-- I could say 2t squared.
Sorry, it will be a new vector-- position vector-- not a unit vector.
And hopefully we will be able to use that to understand, orget a better intuition, behind what exactly it means to take a derivative of a position vector valued function.
So at this point the derivative of our position vector function is going to be 1i plus 2j.
We're doing dt here, we have du here, but we're going to get the same exact number for any a or b, andgiven this vector f and the position vector path r of t.
This, the path defined by this position vector function is going look more like this.
And we're summing the dot product of the value of the vector field at that point, the dot product of that, with dr,or the differential of our position vector function.
So when t is equal to b,we get a position vector that points to that point right there.
So our position vector function-- we always need one of those to do a line integral or a vector line integral--r of t is going to be equal to x of t times i plus y of t times j 4t going between a and b.
So for some(u, v),if you would find the position vector… it takes us to that point on the surface right over there.
The present work faces the problem of safely controlling the position trajectory of multirotor uavs by taking into consideration a conic constraint on the total thrust vector anda linear convex constraint on the position vector.
Specifically, let formula_2 be the position vector of some point formula_3, and let formula_4 be a nonzero vector. .
In classical mechanics, a central force on an object is a force whose magnitude only depends on the distance"r" of the object from the origin and is directed along the line joining them: :formula_1where formula_2 is the force, F is a vector valued force function,"F" is a scalar valued force function,r is the position vector,__r__ is its length, and formula_3 r/__r__ is the corresponding unit vector.
So when you say it's a position vector, you're literally saying, OK, this vector literally specifies that point in space.
So you see, as you keep increasing you value of t until you get to b, these position vectors-- we're going to keep specifying points along this curve.
Let's say I have a position vector function that looks like this. r of t is equal to x of t times the unit vector i plus y of t times the unit vector j.
And then, as t increases,it traces out a curve, or the endpoints of our position vectors trace a curve that looks something like that.
So hopefully you realize that, look, these position vectors really are specifying the same points on this curve as this original, I guess, straight up parameterization that we did for this curve.
And to do that,I will assume… that our surface can be parametrized… by the position vector function, r… and r is a function of two parameters.
Since the divergence of the position vector q is: formula_25the divergence theorem implies that: formula_26where d"V" is an infinitesimal volume within the container and"V" is the total volume of the container.
It's a vector, so it's telling us the instantaneous change in our position vector with respect to t, or time, when time is equal to 1 second.
And we know that M total times the position vector of the center of mass-- this is the way we defined it last time-- equals m1 times the position vector of particle 1 plus m2 times the position vector of particle 2.