Examples of using Sequential memory test in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Sequential Memory Test for Verbal and Non-Verbal Sounds.
The literature also points to a relationship between learning deficits andpoorer outcomes in the verbal sequential memory test.
In the verbal sequential memory test, the mean correct answers for the HLGR was higher than for the HLGL Figure 2.
In the other comparisonsdifferences were not significant, as occurred for all comparisons in the non-verbal sequential memory test.
The Verbal Sequential Memory test used the syllables pa, ta, ca, fa in different orders and the individual should repeat the correct sequence.
Most of the students who showed deficits in the verbal sequential memory test have classes in the classrooms with high Leq values.
Regarding the Sequential Memory Tests for Verbal and Non-Verbal sounds, 11.4% 5/44 of the children had altered results in both tests, and 88.6% 39/44, had normal results.
The auditory ability of temporal ordering for verbal sounds was evaluated using the verbal sequential memory test administered by trained investigators.
In the non-verbal sequential memory test MSSNV sound instruments were used rattle, coconut, agogo and bells, sounded in three different sequences.
It is noteworthy that the sound localization test, compared to verbal and non-verbal sequential memory tests revealed more children with inadequate results.
The largest amount of hits of the verbal sequential memory test occurs by the constant exposure of the children to the spoken language, independent of any other variable mentioned in the study.
Auditory processing was assessed through the following tests: Speech-in-Noise,Sound localization in five directions, Verbal and non-verbal sequential memory test, and Random gap detection test RGDT.
In the Sequential Memory Test, verbal verbal sequential memory and non-linguistic sounds non-verbal sequential memory are presented in a diotic task without visual cues.
The simplified auditory processing evaluation consisted of the following tests: 1 Sequential Memory Test for Non-verbal sounds, 2 Sequential Memory Test for Verbal Sons, 3 Sound Location Test. .
The difference between these sequential memory tests and the SSW test is the level of complexity of the exercise. During the sequential memory tests, particularly for non-verbal sounds, the patient may benefit from the assistance of spatial clues.
Auditory processing assessments were conducted using simplified standard evaluation techniques consisting of the following tests: 1 Sequential Memory Test for non-verbal sounds, 2 Sequential Memory Test for verbal sounds, 3 Sound Localization Test. .
This ability was assessed in this study with the sequential memory test for verbal and non-verbal sounds that characterize the alteration of the physiological mechanism of temporal processing.
The following procedures were carried out: meatoscopy, pure tone audiometry, logoaudiometry, immittance testing and a simplified evaluation of auditory processing that consisted of thelocalization of sounds test, the verbal and non-verbal sounds for sequential memory test PSI/SSIMCC, and the dichotic digit test binaural integration step.
Diotic tests: Sound location test LS24, Verbal sequential memory test MSSV24, non-verbal sequential memory testMSSNV, and Auditory Fusion Test- Revised AFT-R.
All subjects were submitted to the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, basic audiological assessment anamnesis, meatoscopy, pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, acoustic immittance measures, and contralateral acoustic reflex andbehavioral auditory processing sound localization test, sequential memory test for verbal and non-verbal sounds, dichotic digit test- applied and analyzed according to the criteria proposed by Pereira and Schochat to exclude the presence of peripheral hearing loss and/or auditory processing disorder.
To analyze the relationship between student performance in the verbal sequential memory test and classroom equivalent sound pressure levels, the Leq variable was categorized on the basis of the median value of 60 dBA.
Children with musical experience had a superior performance on the memory ability for sounds in sequence,evaluated in verbal and non-verbal sequential memory tests with four instruments, with performance similar to that expected for six years old children, determined by their musical experience.
Diotic tests: sound localization test SL, verbal sequential memory test VSMT, non-verbal sequential memory test NVSMT, Random Gap Detection Test RGDT, and Sustained Auditory Attention Ability Test SAAAT.
The results regarding the mean value of right answers obtained in percentages,considering the Sequential Memory Tests for Verbal Sounds, Sequential Memory Test for non-verbal tests and digits dichotic test, are depicted on Table 4.
Because there is no dichotic listening test standardized and validated for the Brazilian context,we chose to adapt the verbal sequential memory test to be used with a group in order to simulate an actual teaching-learning situation in the classroom setting. Considering that the literature reports 65 dB as the vocal intensity of teachers in that setting, the test was recorded and played back at 65dB.
Among the simple temporal ordering skills,poorer performance was observed in the test of sequential memory to non-verbal sounds, corroborating another study.
We verified a predominance of failure in the test for sequential memory for verbal sounds, observed in 58 73.3% of these 92 children.
The simplified auditory processing AP test was performed at a sound field with the following procedures:sound localization test and memory test for sequential sounds.