Examples of using Accuracy factor in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Planning accuracy factor.
The Committee on Conferences may wish to decide on benchmark figures for the meeting ratio and planning accuracy factor at its substantive session of 1994.
Planning accuracy factor percentage.
Fifty-eight per cent of the bodies had planning accuracy factors of 90 to 100 per cent.
Planning accuracy factor percentage.
Thus, in 2000, 71 per cent of the bodies had planning accuracy factors above 80 per cent.
In New York, the planning accuracy factor decreased by 4 per cent to 79 per cent in 2012 from 83 per cent in 2011.
Thus, in 2004, 77 per cent of the bodies had planning accuracy factors of 80 per cent and above.
Planning accuracy factor by number and percentage of meetings of bodies in the core sample by duty station.
The following is a breakdown of the planning accuracy factor of the bodies in the sample from 2003 to 2005.
The planning accuracy factor at the four duty stations decreased by 2 per cent to 86 per cent in 2012 from 88 per cent in 2011 and 2010 see supplementary information, sect. II, table 6.
At the United Nations Office at Geneva, the planning accuracy factor remained at 96 per cent, as in 2010 and 2011.
PAF Planning accuracy factor, calculated as meetings planned, minus additional meetings, minus cancellations, all as a percentage of meetings planned A minus B minus C as a percentage of A.
At the United Nations Office at Nairobi, the planning accuracy factor increased to 100 per cent in 2012 from 93 per cent in 2011.
PAF The planning accuracy factor, calculated as meetings planned, minus additional meetings, minus cancellations, all as a percentage of meetings planned(A minus B minus C as a percentage of A);
Thus, in 2005, 79 per cent of the bodies had a planning accuracy factor of 80 per cent and above, a 2 per cent improvement over 2004.
The overall planning accuracy factor at the four duty stations remained at 88 per cent in 2011(the same as in 2010), with New York recording an increase, to 83 per cent in 2011 from 82 per cent in 2010 see supplementary information, sect. II, table 6.
Thus, in 1994, 28 per cent of the bodies had planning accuracy factors below 80 per cent; 72 per cent had factors above 80 per cent.
The overall planning accuracy factor at the four duty stations increased to 88 per cent in 2010 from 84 per cent in 2009, with New York recording a significant increase, to 82 per cent in 2010 from 77 per cent in 2009 see supplementary information, sect. II, table 6.
In view of the foregoing, a meeting ratio of 100 per cent and a planning accuracy factor of 80 per cent may be considered recommended benchmarks.
It had also noted that the planning accuracy factor had improved by 5 per cent over the 2005 reporting period and that the overall time lost owing to late starts and early endings had decreased.
With the exception of the Special Political andDecolonization Committee(Fourth Committee), the planning accuracy factor had also declined for the Main Committees and for the plenary over this period.
The data included the planning accuracy factor, the meeting ratio and utilization factor and indices for assessing compliance with the deadlines for the submission of pre-session documentation and availability of such documentation for bodies based in those locations.
With regard to changes to the methodology, the Committee considered that the utilization factor(UF)was clearly superior as an overall measurement of utilization to both the meeting ratio(MR) and the planning accuracy factor(PAF) and should thus be kept as the primary index.
Thus in 2006, 84 per cent of the bodies had a planning accuracy factor of 80 per cent or higher, a 7 per cent improvement over the 2005 and 2004 reporting periods.
With regard to changes to the methodology, the Committee considered that the utilization factor(UF)was a complex index that incorporated all the aspects of the meeting ratio(MR) and the planning accuracy factor(PAF) and included utilization of meeting time as a factor as well.
Thus, in 2007 76 per cent of the bodies had a planning accuracy factor of 80 per cent or higher, as compared with 84 per cent in 2006 and 79 per cent in 2005.
Members of the Committee on Conferences had engaged in extensive discussions on that topic and had noted that, while the overall utilization rate at the four main duty stations remained above the established benchmark of 80 per cent, it had decreased from 85 per cent in 2005 to 83 per cent in 2006,although the planning accuracy factor had improved by 5 per cent over the same period.
Note: In 2009, 79 per cent of the sessions of the bodies had a planning accuracy factor of 80 per cent or higher, which is 11 percentage points less than reported in 2008 but 3 percentage points higher than in 2007.
The Committee on Conferences noted in its report(A/56/32) the concerns expressed by chairpersons of intergovernmental bodies on the methodology used to calculate the utilization factor and looked forward to receiving a further analysis and review of the indices,including possible benchmark figures for the planning accuracy factor and the meeting ratio, among others, and a measurement of the degree to which unutilized services were reallocated.