Examples of using Austrian proposal in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Austrian proposal was not accepted.
Therefore, we do not adhere to the Austrian proposal.
The Austrian proposal was put to a vote, but was not adopted.
She therefore supported the Austrian proposal to delete the reference.
Probably WP.15 did not take account of all the consequences during the discussion of the Austrian proposal.
An informal Austrian proposal for a reformulation of article 18 would read as follows.
Mr. MICHALSKI(United States)said that his delegation would comment on the Austrian proposals at a later date.
The principle of the Austrian proposal was to consider additive receptacles in tanks as being tank equipment.
It therefore adopted an amendment to special provision 651 on the basis of the Austrian proposal which was redrafted during the meeting see annex.
The Austrian proposal would have to be reviewed to allow for the necessary adjustment to the ADR legal framework and to the structure of the annexes.
The United States strongly supports the Austrian proposal, and I urge all my colleagues to do the same.
The Austrian proposals to introduce a separate documentation and marking of additive devices and to mention the additive in the transport document have not been supported by a majority of ECFD members, and have therefore been rejected.
GE.03-21730 In the twentieth session of the Sub-Committee of Experts, only part 2 of the Austrian proposal ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2002/10 has been discussed in depth.
The document below reproduces the Austrian proposal together as well as the comments received from other Governments and River Commissions.
Explanation: we propose leaving term 57 as currently worded or,if the Working Party should choose to adopt the Austrian proposal, making the following emendations text from item 4-4.1.1.
It considered that the Austrian proposal should not be examined until the outcome of that work was known ECE/TRANS/WP.15/AC.2/34, para. 48.
The acting Swiss presidency of the Central Commission for the Navigation on the Rhine takes this opportunity to express the common position of the five member States Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands andSwitzerland with respect to the Austrian proposal.
It is not clear from the Austrian proposal whether terms 124 and 125 are to be deleted or not; we propose to retain them, appropriately renumbered.
Mr. President, we now hope that you will be able to guide the Conference forward so thatwe can take an early decision and during this session proceed to establish an ad hoc committee on the basis of the Austrian proposal and the 1995 Shannon report and mandate.
The representative of Portugal said that the Austrian proposal had merit as it clarified the role and obligations of the various parties concerned.
The representative of the Netherlands said that two annexes should be enough for the transitional provisions, one for vessels holding an ADNR certificate and the other for vessels without such a certificate forthe latter case see, inter alia, the Austrian proposal in document TRANS/AC.6/R.8.
The translation into Russian of the Austrian proposal contains a number of inaccuracies, and this has led to mistakes and divergent readings of the definitions of the terms proposed.
The representative of the Netherlands, as Chairman of the Working Group of the Committee of Experts on the restructuring of RID recalled(see INF.3, para. 13)that the Working Group supported the Austrian proposal and said that, subject to a decision by the Joint Meeting, the proposed texts should be incorporated in the technical annexes of the restructured RID.
We also appreciate the Austrian proposal whose conceptual motivations were illustrated by Ambassador Kreid, as well as the Canadian proposals with their illuminating arguments.
The Working Pargy may also wish to note that, as agreed at the last session(TRANS/WP.15/157, para.93) a proposal TRANS/WP.1/1999/31 has been transmitted to the Working Partyon Road Traffic Safety(WP.1) for the rectification of consolidated resolution R.E.2 in respect of road signs intended for vehicles carrying dangerous goods on the basis of the Austrian proposal TRANS/WP.15/1999/26.
But there appears to be no justification for the Austrian proposals to delete from chapters 1 and 2 a great many definitions relating to refuse generated on board, electrical equipment and so forth.
The Austrian proposal was not accepted as the Working Party felt that marginal 10 282(4) taken in conjunction with marginal 211 152 already made it possible to move empty, uncleaned tank-vehicles after the expiry date of the certificate of approval.
The Working Party recalled that the main aim of the Austrian proposal was to promote and to facilitate the use of the CEVNI rules, which could be achieved by other means than transforming CEVNI into a legally binding international document.
They took the view that the Austrian proposal was the result of work relating exclusively to the legal framework of RID and that great care would be needed if the proposed texts were to be incorporated in the annexes of ADR, given the different legal frameworks.
The meeting carefully examined the table from OECD/PIARC as developed in the Austrian proposal and finally agreed on a comprehensively revised version, whilst maintaining the principles of the OECD/PIARC grouping system based on accident scenarios see annex.