Examples of using Author asserts in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author asserts that she knew nothing of the events of 6 August.
The book is written from an anti-Islamic, and as the author asserts, Orthodox Christian viewpoint.
The author asserts that, since his extradition, he has been refused bail.
The Committee must decide whether the authorities' ban on dwarf tossing constitutes discrimination within the meaning of article 26 of the Covenant, as the author asserts.
The author asserts that since his release from detention, he has continued to practise Falun Gong.
People also translate
In a letter dated 3 August 2004, the author asserts that he is not abusing the right to submit communications.
The author asserts, therefore, that his rights under article 19, paragraph 2, and article 21 of the Covenant have been violated.
Concerning article 18, the author asserts that the authorities have seriously impaired the exercise of her freedom of religion.
The author asserts that Spain violated its obligation under article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.
Concerning article 18, the author asserts that the authorities seriously impaired the exercise of his freedom of religion.
The author asserts that the State party has not provided her with legal protection on an equal basis with men, nor has it protected her against discrimination through competent national tribunals, contrary to its obligations under article 2(c) of the Convention.
In this connection, the author asserts that the word"arbitrary" in article 17 should be interpreted in the light of articles 4, 9, 12 and 13 of the Covenant.
The author asserts that the school director and the technical manager"conspired" to distort and blur all the evidence.
The Committee notes that the author asserts that his son, Yahia Kroumi, was arrested by soldiers in his presence on 12 August 1994 at his home and has subsequently disappeared.
The author asserts that the nature of the application for judicial review prevents consideration of the facts.
Comments of the author 6.1 In a letter dated 10 February 1997, the author asserts that the Tribunal Administratif de Versailles did not take account, in its decision of 13 June 1995 to refuse him a residence permit, of the documents submitted to it as supporting evidence of his integration into French society.
The author asserts that it would not be difficult for the State party to recognize the right of appeal against convictions handed down for the first time by the Supreme Court, since its domestic legislation provides for solutions to similar cases, such as judgements on cases tried in sole instance by the administrative division of the Supreme Court, which can be appealed in a special division of the same court.
With regard to article 14, the author asserts that he has no access to a judicial procedure whereby he may challenge, in a fair hearing, the conclusions reached by parliament and the administration and that his right to be presumed innocent has not been respected.
The author asserts that she was accused of having treated and supplied medicines to"terrorists" and their family members.
The author asserts that a number of rights to which she is entitled under the Convention have been violated, including the following.
The author asserts that the complaint of torture was not dealt with promptly and was subsequently processed slowly and incompetently.
The author asserts in his complaint(paragraph 3.2 of the Views) that the alleged facts are in breach of article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
The author asserts that the new evidence systematically addressed the issues raised by the Tribunal, including his level of knowledge of Falun Gong.
The author asserts that, even though he had been released on parole, the State party would not allow him to visit his children or his mother.
The author asserts, therefore, that all domestic remedies have been exhausted for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
The author asserts that, on 13 October 2010, the Refugee Appeals Board rejected his appeal and ordered him to leave the country immediately.
The author asserts that she is not exercising an actio popularis since she is the successor of the victim who died without reparation or response as to the merits of his case.
The author asserts that, in refusing to examine his application, the district court, the Minsk Municipal Court and the Supreme Court were in breach of the above-mentioned legislation.
The author asserts that he would not be able to demonstrate that he left Eritrea legally, because he has never lived in Eritrea and has no passport or exit stamp from that country.
The author asserts that he has exhausted all available domestic remedies before the prison authorities and the Prison Supervision Court in his attempts to obtain conditional release.