Examples of using Author explained in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author explained that he had been working with his lawyer and the investigation officer but had become tired.
That is why this movie concerns the modern history of Ukrainians",- the author explained the purpose of the movie.
On 28 October 2011, the author explained that the Committee's Views remained unimplemented.
We are interested in the following questions: how the price of an apartment depends on the location,on the district where it is situated"- the author explained.
The author explained that he had invoked article 3 of the CRC only in conjunction with article 24 of the Covenant.
People also translate
As to the last ill-treatment by the police of 10 December 2003, the author explained that the lack of complaints by him and his wife were due to despair and fear of reprisals.
The author explained that he had invoked article 3 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child only in conjunction with article 24 of the Covenant.
Having been asked whether she was not afraid that her daughter would be circumcised,since her daughter's father belonged to the Mogishu clan, the author explained that she was worried but there was nothing that she could do about it.
During the initial interview the author explained the basic elements that had provoked his flight to Sweden.
Author explained his idea of his own childhood nostalgia, in which instead of expensive gadgets, which play today's children were playing in the"classics", hide and seek and good books.
On 28 November 2011, the author explained that the State party had given no effect to the Committee's Views.
The author explained that, while he knew the deceased from the time when he lived in Hanover, he had not visited that town since June 1985 and knew nothing about the crime.
On 19 September 2010, with regard to article 14 of the Covenant, the author explained that he is not alleging that the judicial branch in the State party is incompetent or that he is not satisfied with the results of the proceedings before the national courts.
The author explained that he lives in Mazar e Sharif, 500 kilometres north of Kabul, and has difficulty reaching Kabul by land during the winter.
On 6 September 2010, the author explained that he is still in prison, serving a sentence for a crime he did not commit.
The author explained that he approached the Philippines Board of Pardons and Parole, to be granted an unconditional pardon, referring to the Committee's Views.
On 11 June 2007, the author explained that all the procedural delays in the Superior Court of Quebec were occasioned by the Attorney General of Quebec.
The author explained that starting 20 February 2008, after President Sarkisian's electoral victory, a number of peaceful demonstrations took place, at which the author was present to maintain order.
By letter of 21 September 2010, the author explained that no measures had been taken so far by the State party's authorities to implement the Committee's Views.
The author explained how it was following such allegations by the employer that she filed an additional case for gender-based discrimination in the workplace before the Kocaeli 3rd Labour Court which consolidated the two cases.
On 25 January 2011, the author explained that no action had been taken by the State party in 2010 to give effect to the Committee's Views in his case.
The author explained that he suffers from myopia and that a doctor had advised him to take 15-minute breaks from reading every hour, that copying protocols took time and that he had had no intention of protracting the case file review.
At the hearing on 17 June 2003, the author explained that the Department of Justice's inspection in April 2003 was undertaken without any"Civil Initiatives" representatives present, and only on the basis of written materials presented by the association.
The author explained to the court that there should be a certificate dated 13 August 2000 in his case file confirming that his previous lawyer Ms. Abramova had successfully passed an examination to become a magistrate judge and that he had subsequently retained Mr. Nekhoroshev as his new defence counsel.
In an affidavit of 6 August, the author explained the circumstances of the incident and stated that she believed that she was capable of caring for her daughter, and that she would be pleased to have the Children's Aid Society attend her home to follow her parenting style.
On 7 April 2011, the author explained that the State party's observations do not correspond to the reality, and constitute an attempt to avoid giving effect to the Committee's Views.
On 23 April 2009, the author explained that pursuant to the provisions of the Code on Administrative Offences, court rulings concerning administrative discipline(fining) are final and not subjected to appeal art. 266, part 2, of the Code.
On 21 May 1997 the author explained her position to the public prosecutor in Larbâa, who wrote to the chief of police of Larbâa and instructed the author to deliver the letter personally so that the police chief could launch an investigation into her son's disappearance.
On 25 April 2008, the author explained that the sole legal remedy available to him for the reinstatement of his rights consists in contesting the validity of the only domestic decision having become final, namely, the legal decision on the publication of the 2006 parliamentary report.
In the course of the additional investigation, the author explained that he had not been beaten at the time of his arrest but that the beatings and other forms of physical violence were used by officers on the premises of the District Department in the presence of the investigator who did not intervene.