Examples of using Avena in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Avena got with Charlie.
Characterization of the genetic diversity of the Siberian varieties of oats avena i.
Show Avena Resort& Spa Hotel- All Inclusive on the map.
An argument similar to that described above in La Grand was raised in Avena.
Avena and Other Mexican Nationals Mexico v. United States of America.
People also translate
Application for the case concerning Avena and other Mexican nationals(Mexico v. United States of America) 79 500.
Bernardo Sepulveda has been chosen as Judge ad-hoc of the International Court of Justice in the Case concerning Avena and other Mexican nationals Mexico v. United States.
In the Avena case, it had not been the intention of Mexico to request the Court to open the prison door.
This approach was taken by the International Court of Justice in the Avena and other Mexican Nationals judgment.
A corporate website for Avena, a company that manufactures products, has been developed.
Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 31 March 2004 in the case concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals(Mexico v. United States);
Hotel Avena Resort& Spa Hotel cost depends on the season and prices can be much different basing on selected dates.
The motto I proposed for the Review was Tenui musam meditamur avena.-'We cultivate literature on a little oatmeal.
The La Grand and Avena cases require special mention in this connection as they involved both consular assistance and diplomatic protection.
On 31 March 2004 the Court delivered its Judgment in the case concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals Mexico v. United States of America.
The three-star Pension Avena is located in Stribro and offers comfortable accommodation for tourists, families with children, or business travelers.
The same argument had been raised andthe same response given in the case concerning Avena and other Mexican Nationals Mexico v. United States of America.
In the case concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals(Mexico v. United States of America), Mexico chose Mr. Bernardo Sepúlveda to sit as judge ad hoc.
We are also pleased that the Court issued a binding reaffirmation of the obligations incumbent upon the United States under paragraph 153(9) of the Avena ruling of 2004.
The case concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals(Mexico v. United States of America) is similar to the historic LaGrand case Germany v. United States of America.
Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 31 March 2004 in the Case concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals(Mexico v. United States of America) Mexico v. United States of America.
In the United States of America, in January 2014, the State of Texas executed Edgar Arias Tamayo,one of the 51 Mexican nationals subject to the International Court of Justice Avena decision.
In the Avena and other Mexican Nationals decision, the International Court of Justice pondered whether the right of consular notification and communication was to be considered a fundamental human right.
Mexico welcomes the Court's decision on the Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 31 March 2004 in the Case concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals Mexico v. United States of America.
The conclusions of the International Court of Justice in the Avena Judgement differed substantially from the advisory opinion issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and it was inappropriate to refer to them.
Nevertheless, it could point out a specific violation,such as the violation of article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations in the Avena case, while leaving rectification in the hands of the State.
It made Orders on the requests for provisional measures in the cases concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals(Mexico v. United States of America) and Certain Criminal Proceedings in France Republic of the Congo v. France.
Despite repeated national andinternational calls to suspend further executions, another Mexican national was executed in the State of Texas in April 2014, in violation of the Avena decision.
Despite the clear theoretical distinction between the two institutions there are overlaps(as illustrated by La Grand and Avena) and failures to distinguish the two as shown by the European Union treaties.
He cited the examples of the La Grand and Avena cases, where the foreign nationals had committed atrocious crimes but their misconduct had not been raised by the respondent State to defend itself against the charges of failure to grant them consular access.