Examples of using Code analyzers in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Let's begin with static code analyzers.
Static code analyzers are not tools to be used from time to time.
These may be dynamic or static code analyzers.
Static code analyzers and black-box testing are methods which can be automated.
The competitive tools are general-purpose code analyzers.
The existing lint-like code analyzers were of little help and required many efforts to be set.
It's excellent proof that we need those tireless code analyzers.
And then with the help of static code analyzers' reports after night runs.
There are a lot of commercial andfree static code analyzers.
Currently existing compilers and code analyzers allow finding only some(very few) potential errors.
For example, Coverity Scan, a leader among code analyzers.
The article continues the idea that static code analyzers are tools to be used regularly, not once.
We took into account our experience of working with traditional lint-like code analyzers.
It's not a secret that far not all the code analyzers understand templates.
It is desirable that the programmer understand the principles of working with static code analyzers.
The above-mention products are code analyzers as well.
Originally, the new diagnostics were free, andwere created as a way to attract attention to the 64-bit and OpenMP code analyzers.
Compilers and third-party static code analyzers have one common task: to detect dangerous code fragments.
First, we should use static code analyzers.
Dynamic code analyzers are meant to find errors in an application while the latter is running a program.
It is considered to be one of the best static code analyzers on market.
Running static code analyzers on projects like that may reveal interesting results and help developers improve their products' quality.
There are numbers of both commercial andfree static code analyzers nowadays.
When analyzing larger projects static code analyzers usually generate a lot of error messages or warnings.
Many other compilers, however, have their own good integrated code analyzers too.
Static code analyzers are meant for complex securing of the code quality and contain several hundreds of analyzed rules 4.
The cheapest way to detect many of them is to use static code analyzers 2.
Despite there existed early andexist now some other code analyzers(as a rule link-like ones), Viva64 is distinguished on principle by.
The array index out of bounds error can be diagnosed with static or dynamic code analyzers.