Examples of using Detectability requirement in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Already emplaced mines are excluded from detectability requirement;
The proposed detectability requirement can be excluded in certain effectively controlled areas and facilities.
The Amended Mines Protocol's detectability requirements; Art. 4.
A detectability requirement facilitates the clearance of these weapons and thus can reduce the dangers they pose to civilians.
That MOTAPM already emplaced in minefields are excluded from the detectability requirement.
MOTAPM emplaced after… can be excluded from the detectability requirement if they are located in a perimeter-marked area, which is.
MOTAPM emplaced in minefields before the entry into force of this set of recommendations for a State are excluded from the detectability requirement in this chapter.
All MOTAPMs from existing stocks shall meet the detectability requirement of this chapter prior to their emplacement, except in the case referred to in paragraph 20.
A MOTAPM emplaced in a perimeter-marked area is excluded from the detectability requirement of this chapter.
Existing MOTAPM stocks that do not meet the detectability requirement may be used until the end of the transition period for the respective State Party;
MOTAPM/AVM used in a perimeter-marked area are excluded from the detectability requirement of this Annex.
MOTAPM can be excluded from the detectability requirement if they are, in order to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from the area, located in a perimeter-marked area.
In the meantime that State shall, to the extent feasible,minimize the use of any MOTAPM/AVM that does not meet the detectability requirement of this chapter.
Existing stocks of MOTAPM, which have not been emplaced,shall meet the detectability requirement in paragraph 11 prior to their emplacement, except in the case referred to in paragraph 13.
That, after the provisions contained in this paragraph, become effective, future MOTAPM and existing stocks, which have not been emplaced,should meet the detectability requirement prior to their use.
Undertakes not to transfer of MOTAPM which do not meet the detectability requirement, except for the purpose of destruction or for development of and training in mine detection, mine clearance, or mine destruction techniques.
A sufficient transition period may allow some States Parties,which do not see an urgent need for detectability requirement, to commit themselves to it later.
The transfer of MOTAPM which do not meet the detectability requirement should be prohibited, except for the purpose of destruction or for development of and training in mine destruction, mine clearance, or mine destruction techniques.
One could understand the phrase to mean that if a State Party does not intend for its MOTAPM to be cleared by humanitarian mine clearance organizations,its mines would not have to meet the detectability requirement.
MOTAPM produced after… and existing stocks which have not been emplaced,shall meet the detectability requirement prior to their use, except in the case referred to in paragraph 9.
This would ensure that the detectability requirement is as clear as that for AP mines under Amended Protocol II. If a reference to humanitarian demining is required, it could be placed in Section I on General Considerations.
After the provisions contained in this paper become effective, future MOTAPM and existing stocks which have not been emplaced,should meet the detectability requirement prior to their use, except in the case referred to in paragraph 5 above.
Undertakes not to transfer any MOTAPM which does not meet the detectability requirement of chapter III, except for the purpose of destruction or for development of and training in mine detection, mine clearance, or mine destruction techniques;
Proposals on detectability requirement for AV mines have been discussed on several occasions in the CCW, most notably in 1995, as part of the negotiation of Amended Protocol II, and between 2002 and 2006 as States attempted to negotiate a new CCW protocol on AV mines.
That newly emplaced MOTAPM in minefields along national borders or sensitive facilities be excluded from the detectability requirement if they are located in a perimeter-marked area which is monitored by military personnel or protected by fencing or other means, to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from the area.
In the mid-1990's proposals for detectability requirements and self-destruct features for anti-vehicle mines were discussed as part of the work to amend Protocol II. More recently, as is widely known, CCW States Parties undertook focussed work on anti-vehicle mines between 2002 and 2006.
Efforts to ameliorate the impact of the detectability requirement on mines such as phase in periods, grandfathering some older types of mines no longer being produced, etc., could be discussed.
Newly emplaced MOTAPM may be excluded from the detectability requirement if they are located in a perimeter-marked area which is documented and monitored by military personnel[and; or] protected by fencing or other means, to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from the area.
There was no requirement for detectability of MOTAPM.
The cost of modifying mines to meet the 8 grams requirement for detectability is prohibitive.