Examples of using Meta-evaluation in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Meta-evaluation is the evaluation of an evaluation.
The quality of unfpa evaluation work:key findings from the 2005 meta-evaluation 7.
The Evaluation Office completed a meta-evaluation of the quality of evaluations undertaken by country offices.
Iii. the quality of unfpa evaluation work:key findings from the 2005 meta-evaluation.
UNICEF also planned to conduct a meta-evaluation of all internal and external evaluations addressing child protection.
Baseline for normative-operational links to be established by 2010 meta-evaluation.
The First Report was based on a meta-evaluation of the evaluation reports, studies, and reviews of the Independent Evaluation Office since OPS4.
Originally'child protection in national development plans'; changed to a meta-evaluation with far more rigorous analysis.
A meta-evaluation was carried out in terms of a"Comparative Review of the Lessons Learned from 20 Integrated Programme(IP) Evaluations.
In line with this,UNFPA initiated the preparation of a meta-evaluation focusing on the quality of the Fund's evaluation practices with a view to improving them.
The meta-evaluation conducted by an external independent reviewer assessed the overall quality of all evaluations completed in 2013 see figure 5.
One of the examples, as per Executive Board decision 2005/35, was the systematic application of a meta-evaluation approach in the RCF evaluations.
A meta-evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals Achievement Fund programme will be conducted, with UNICEF participation, in 2011.
It used quantitative and qualitative methods, including a document review, interviews, surveys,a field mission and a meta-evaluation of UNHCR evaluation reports.
Report on the meta-evaluation of the relevance, effectiveness and impact of United Nations peacekeeping operations was drafted in June 2012.
A thematic analysis of programming on violence against children summarizes findings from a meta-evaluation of 52 country-level evaluations conducted between 2005 and 2010.
In 2008 a meta-evaluation was initiated to analyze 26 evaluations, nine reviews and eight other assessments/reports conducted by UNIFEM between 2004 and 2008.
The improved evidence from ADRs conducted in about 15 countries form a strong basis for meta-evaluation in the result areas mandated by the Executive Board for UNDP.
In 2005, UNFPA conducted its first meta-evaluation, aimed at establishing a baseline for improvements in the quality and consistency of UNFPA-funded evaluations.
Lastly, it revised its criteria for assessing reports to improve the quality and credibility of decentralized andcorporate evaluations, based on a meta-evaluation completed in 2012.
The final universe of evaluation reports for the meta-evaluation thus consisted of 168 reports, including three Secretariat-wide evaluations conducted by OIOS.
A meta-evaluation of 28 UNHCR reports from 2010 and 2011, produced by the UNHCR Policy Development and Evaluation Service and identified as evaluation reports on its website.
System-wide joint programme evaluation completed in 2012; one meta-evaluation of all gender evaluations in the United Nations system completed in 2013 4 partnerships on evaluation capacity.
The meta-evaluation of the quality of UNICEF-supported evaluations revealed the need to take energetic action to strengthen national evaluation at the country level.
UN-Women corporate and decentralized evaluations are undertaken during different stages of the programme life cycle and include evaluability assessment, midterm evaluation,final evaluation and meta-evaluation.
In terms of quality, the meta-evaluation of evaluation reports highlighted present strengths, weaknesses and areas for improvement in the quality of evaluations.
The unit initiated four corporate evaluations(one of which was completed during the reporting period)following an open competitive tendering process; one meta-evaluation of twenty six evaluations; nine reviews; and eight other assessments completed between 2004 and 2008.
In 2008, a meta-evaluation was initiated to analyse 26 evaluations, 9 reviews and 8 assessments/reports conducted by UNIFEM between 2004 and 2008.
In order to strengthen evaluation capacity-building within UNICEF, a meta-evaluation of the quality of evaluations performed by the country offices together with national authorities was completed, identifying areas where improvement is required.
The meta-evaluation conducted by an external consultant used five indicators to assess the quality of the sample of 23 evaluation reports consisting of programme-level self-evaluations and central-level external evaluations.