Examples of using Prosecutor considers in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Prosecutor considers that 40 suspects could be tried in national jurisdictions.
After protracted proceedings, Serbia submitted a response that the Prosecutor considers to be inadequate and incomplete.
The Prosecutor considers that approximately forty suspects could be tried in national jurisdictions.
Although similar problems are not experienced in ICTY,in principle the Prosecutor considers that she should have the necessary spending authority and corresponding financial accountability.
The Prosecutor considers that approximately forty suspects could be tried in national jurisdictions.
In particular, as the investigation progresses and when he deems it timely,the Prosecutor shall forward to the Pre-Trial Judge information that the Prosecutor considers necessary for, inter alia, the confirmation of any indictment rule 88 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
The Prosecutor considers that approximately forty suspects could be tried in national jurisdictions.
If all three legs of the above strategy, joinder of accused, referral of cases, and refinement of procedures, continue to be pursued actively, and if the remaining fugitives are arrested soon andquickly delivered to The Hague, the Prosecutor considers that the Tribunal will be in a position to complete its trial programme within 18 months after the target date of the end of 2008, with the last trials beginning in the course of 2009.
As soon as the Prosecutor considers that an indictment is forthcoming, recruit essential additional staff;
The Prosecutor considers any determination within article 26(1)(b)(i) to(iii) prevents further action; or.
At this stage of the rules of theroad unit's development and in the framework of the Tribunal's completion strategy, the Prosecutor considers that the prosecutorial review function currently carried out by the unit should be transferred to the State Prosecutor of Bosnia and Herzegovina, as soon as there is a demonstrable capacity to assume this function in respect of the whole of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The Prosecutor considers that there will be no further investigative imperative to continue forensic investigations in Kosovo in 2001.
In determining whether an individual should be tried at the Tribunal, the Prosecutor considers, among other things, the alleged status and extent of the participation of the individual during the genocide, the alleged connection that the individual may have had with other cases, the need to cover the major geographical areas of Rwanda, the availability of evidence with regard to the individual concerned and the availability of investigative material for transmission to a State for national prosecution.
The Prosecutor considers this to be a key recommendation and wishes to stress that far greater resources are required in this area.
The Prosecutor considers that the key to reducing the length of trials lies in the judges being fully informed in advance about the case.
The Prosecutor considers that the key to reducing the length of trials is that the judge should be fully informed in advance about the case.
The Prosecutor considers this to be a key recommendation and urges the Registrar of ICTY to seek additional resources in this critical area.
The Prosecutor considers that the key to reducing the length of trials is that the judges should be fully informed in advance about the case.
The Prosecutor considers that the breadth of remaining indictments cannot be further reduced without beginning to imperil the prospects of their successful prosecution.
The Prosecutor considers that this second leg of the strategy has been implemented as far as possible, and that there remains little or no scope for sending further cases to the former Yugoslavia for prosecution.
Where the Prosecutor considers that article 57, paragraph 3(d), applies, the Prosecutor may submit a written request to the Pre-Trial Chamber for authorization to take certain measures in the territory of the State Party in question.
If the Prosecutor considers, however, that the case is admissible under article 17, he or she shall submit to the Pre-Trial Chamber a written and reasoned request for authorization of an investigation and shall communicate to it all the information provided by the State.
Where the Prosecutor considers that a State Party is in the situation contemplated in article 57, paragraph 3(d), he may submit a written request to the Pre-Trial Chamber for authorization to himself to take certain measures in the territory of the State in question.
Where the Prosecutor considers an investigation to present a unique opportunity to take testimony or a statement from a witness or to examine, collect or test evidence, which may not be available subsequently for the purposes of a trial, the Prosecutor shall so inform the Pre-Trial Chamber.
If the prosecutor considers that no offence has been committed, or that it will not be possible to bring evidence sufficient for conviction and, therefore, discontinues the investigation, the injured party still has the possibility of bringing a civil action claiming compensation for pecuniary or non-pecuniary damage.
Where the Prosecutor considers there is a serious risk that it might not be possible for the testimony to be taken subsequently, he or she may request the Pre-Trial Chamber to take such measures as may be necessary to ensure the efficiency and integrity of the proceedings and, in particular, to protect the rights of the defence, pursuant to article 56, paragraph 2, and rule 5.12 a.
When the Prosecutor considers that there is a serious risk that it might not be possible for the testimony to be taken subsequently, he or she may request the Pre-Trial Chamber to take such measures as may be necessary to ensure the efficiency and integrity of the proceedings and, in particular, to protect the rights of the defence, pursuant to article 56, paragraph 2, and rule 5.12 a.
When the Prosecutor considers that there is a serious risk that it might not be possible for the testimony to be taken subsequently, he or she may request the Pre-Trial Chamber to take such measures as may be necessary to ensure the efficiency and integrity of the proceedings and, in particular, to appoint a counsel or a judge from the Pre-Trial Chamber to be present during the taking of the testimony in order to protect the rights of the defence.
In addition, the prosecutor considered that Grinku could hide from the investigation.
The prosecutor considered that such a publication may encourage separatist sentiments in the region.
